From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C44E9D416 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 17:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B133CE1B8 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 17:59:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C38D03CB064 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 17:59:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132111A001D3 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 17:59:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8885BE24; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 16:59:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1770224380; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BwG4iaNxSAxNVXmDTi3l2IXMp5T8VgpuwSKl+BcDz3w=; b=rvxg2VrNLLCDICwkEoM7vozdVZKULZr42CxYAjZKacsUbvz3cqdFP/8vqgrjRsxT6PUWDI IKpC8yaKQwVyUyqO50CmpvIVavaMy0J/NcNdaP8TftRA3i8Ze7GbY52oYw4y53KfR2qe2V pOI9Xmpj5xlgOkgHw+gZBQ6YLgRkGP4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1770224380; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BwG4iaNxSAxNVXmDTi3l2IXMp5T8VgpuwSKl+BcDz3w=; b=Y2+THEu1GNQ5Lk92wNhpO1EDCkIRfynkQfRDuDA5v3zPRgT7vDyyBHylHDLlqEqB0Job/Z uxLMvzccRm49VUAQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1770224380; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BwG4iaNxSAxNVXmDTi3l2IXMp5T8VgpuwSKl+BcDz3w=; b=rvxg2VrNLLCDICwkEoM7vozdVZKULZr42CxYAjZKacsUbvz3cqdFP/8vqgrjRsxT6PUWDI IKpC8yaKQwVyUyqO50CmpvIVavaMy0J/NcNdaP8TftRA3i8Ze7GbY52oYw4y53KfR2qe2V pOI9Xmpj5xlgOkgHw+gZBQ6YLgRkGP4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1770224380; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BwG4iaNxSAxNVXmDTi3l2IXMp5T8VgpuwSKl+BcDz3w=; b=Y2+THEu1GNQ5Lk92wNhpO1EDCkIRfynkQfRDuDA5v3zPRgT7vDyyBHylHDLlqEqB0Job/Z uxLMvzccRm49VUAQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856DC3EA63; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 16:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id JbHEHvt6g2ljOwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 04 Feb 2026 16:59:39 +0000 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 17:59:38 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20260204165938.GA251768@pevik> References: <20260204115339.224261-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20260204115339.224261-5-pvorel@suse.cz> <20260204124640.GA244528@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[14]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[free.fr]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[lists.linux.it,suse.de,suse.cz,redhat.com,virtuozzo.com,lists.yoctoproject.org,sony.com,free.fr,bootlin.com,linaro.org]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 4/4] kirk: Remove runltp-ng symlink X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Vasileios Almpanis , Tim Bird , Julien Olivain , ltp@lists.linux.it, automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > > Do you agree with removing 'runltp-ng' symlink? > In general I would say yes. If we want to keep the `runtltp` script > name, tho, we can do something like: > install -m 00775 $(abs_srcdir)/kirk-src/kirk $(BASE_DIR)/runltp > inside the `tools/kirk/Makefile`. In this way we keep the same structure > of the previous LTP installation, having a script name that is also more > clear for the regular user. I'm pretty sure a lot of people won't > understand what `kirk` is, inside the main installation folder. I'm not sure if kirk installed as runltp would not cause even more confusion. I'd prefer even not have a symlink. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp