From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: Martin Doucha <martin.doucha@suse.com>,
ltp@lists.linux.it, Sebastian Chlad <sebastian.chlad@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] nfs: Adapt the lib to allow to test in 2-host mode
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 10:38:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260224093820.GA37927@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZyGMpdvgFXoYjHb@yuki.lan>
> Hi!
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Chlad <sebastian.chlad@suse.com>
> > > ---
> > > testcases/network/nfs/nfs_stress/nfs_lib.sh | 22 +++++++++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > diff --git a/testcases/network/nfs/nfs_stress/nfs_lib.sh b/testcases/network/nfs/nfs_stress/nfs_lib.sh
> > > index 1ac8bd657..e52f96a5a 100644
> > > --- a/testcases/network/nfs/nfs_stress/nfs_lib.sh
> > > +++ b/testcases/network/nfs/nfs_stress/nfs_lib.sh
> > > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ TST_SKIP_FILESYSTEMS="exfat,ext2,ext3,fuse,ntfs,vfat,tmpfs"
> > > TST_MOUNT_DEVICE=1
> > > TST_FORMAT_DEVICE=1
> > > TST_NEEDS_ROOT=1
> > > -TST_NEEDS_CMDS="$TST_NEEDS_CMDS mount exportfs mount.nfs"
> > > +TST_NEEDS_CMDS="$TST_NEEDS_CMDS mount mount.nfs"
> I guess that in the furture we want separate scripts for the different
> hosts so that each of them can have proper metadata. I suppose that the
FYI I merged v2 (ecc02095e3). I was also thinking whether add
TST_RHOST_NEEDS_CMDS (or TST_NET_NEEDS_CMDS) variable for checking rhost. My
guess is that more tests will need this check for 2 host side. And while I'm not
keen on extending tst_net.sh, it would show us that in the end something needs
to be handled in LTP metadata (LTP C API struct tst_test or some new struct
tst_net) when we rewrite tests into shell loader or even pure C API.
> TST_MOUNT_DEVICE does not apply to the rhost either.
Good point, it'd be worth to investigate why I added TST_MOUNT_DEVICE=1 and
whether it's still valid.
> And with that we would need some kind of "master file" that would
> explain which script should be executed on which host etc. But I guess
> that it would be tricky to desing this properly.
I'm not sure if separated file is worth of adding. There is tst_rhost_run()
function which should be used for checking, which works well on both netns and 2
host based setup (that's why v2).
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-21 13:53 [LTP] [PATCH] nfs: Adapt the lib to allow to test in 2-host mode Sebastian Chlad
2026-02-22 20:34 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-23 10:41 ` Sebastian Chlad
2026-02-23 10:55 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Chlad
2026-02-24 9:24 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-23 12:01 ` [LTP] [PATCH] " Petr Vorel
2026-02-23 16:54 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-02-23 17:01 ` Sebastian Chlad via ltp
2026-02-24 9:38 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-02-24 10:44 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-02-24 11:46 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-24 12:20 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-02-24 16:11 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-25 9:24 ` Sebastian Chlad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260224093820.GA37927@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=martin.doucha@suse.com \
--cc=sebastian.chlad@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox