* [LTP] [PATCH] tst_kconfig: Don't consider CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION slow
@ 2026-03-16 12:40 Petr Vorel
2026-03-17 12:38 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2026-03-16 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Tumbleweed has only CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION. All tests run ok before
(without 4x longer expected runtime), let's don't blindly increase it.
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
IMHO the only effect of the detection on Tumbleweed would be if test
gets stuck will block testing for 2 min instead of just 30 sec.
Kind regards,
Petr
lib/tst_kconfig.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/tst_kconfig.c b/lib/tst_kconfig.c
index adc56503e2..5f778d2adc 100644
--- a/lib/tst_kconfig.c
+++ b/lib/tst_kconfig.c
@@ -647,7 +647,6 @@ static struct tst_kconfig_var slow_kconfigs[] = {
TST_KCONFIG_INIT("CONFIG_DEBUG_NET"),
TST_KCONFIG_INIT("CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG"),
TST_KCONFIG_INIT("CONFIG_QUOTA_DEBUG"),
- TST_KCONFIG_INIT("CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION"),
TST_KCONFIG_INIT("CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS")
};
--
2.51.0
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] tst_kconfig: Don't consider CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION slow
2026-03-16 12:40 [LTP] [PATCH] tst_kconfig: Don't consider CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION slow Petr Vorel
@ 2026-03-17 12:38 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-17 22:51 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Cervesato via ltp @ 2026-03-17 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Vorel; +Cc: ltp
Hi Petr,
I didn't use fault injection extensively, but I read that when verbose mode is
enabled we might have a big slowdown, so I wouldn't skip this check.
Eventually, we can implement a check that verifies if fault injection is enabled
with a high verbosity. That would probably make more sense.
Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] tst_kconfig: Don't consider CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION slow
2026-03-17 12:38 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
@ 2026-03-17 22:51 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2026-03-17 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Cervesato; +Cc: ltp
Hi Andrea,
> Hi Petr,
> I didn't use fault injection extensively, but I read that when verbose mode is
> enabled we might have a big slowdown, so I wouldn't skip this check.
But it's default off. If one enables it, it could also increase LTP_RUNTIME_MUL.
IMHO the only effect now is 4* longer timeout on a kernel bug which freezes test
running.
> Eventually, we can implement a check that verifies if fault injection is enabled
> with a high verbosity. That would probably make more sense.
Do you mean to look if /sys/kernel/debug/fail*/verbose exist and contain 2?
https://origin.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/fault-injection/fault-injection.html#configure-fault-injection-capabilities-behavior
Kind regards,
Petr
> Regards,
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-17 22:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-16 12:40 [LTP] [PATCH] tst_kconfig: Don't consider CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION slow Petr Vorel
2026-03-17 12:38 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-17 22:51 ` Petr Vorel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox