From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Piotr Kubaj <piotr.kubaj@intel.com>
Cc: daniel.niestepski@intel.com, tomasz.ossowski@intel.com,
helena.anna.dubel@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c: new test
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:52:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260318135230.GB18914@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318130250.68495-2-piotr.kubaj@intel.com>
> Verify for all online logical CPUs that their highest performance value are
> the same for HWP Capability MSR 0x771 and CPPC sysfs file.
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Kubaj <piotr.kubaj@intel.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/power_management/.gitignore | 1 +
> .../power_management/high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++
As I wrote in v1, any tests needs to be added into runtest file,
runtest/power_management_tests in this case.
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/power_management/high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c
...
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> + bool status = true;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < nproc; i++) {
> + char path[PATH_MAX];
> + unsigned long long msr_highest_perf = 0, sysfs_highest_perf = 0;
> +
> + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/acpi_cppc/highest_perf", i);
> + SAFE_FILE_SCANF(path, "%llu", &sysfs_highest_perf);
> + tst_res(TDEBUG, "%s: %llu", path, sysfs_highest_perf);
> +
> + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/dev/cpu/%d/msr", i);
> + int fd = SAFE_OPEN(path, O_RDONLY);
> +
> + if (SAFE_PREAD(1, fd, &msr_highest_perf, sizeof(msr_highest_perf), 0x771) == -1)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "MSR read error");
SAFE_*() functions contain error check, tst_brk() is redundant.
> + msr_highest_perf &= (1ULL << 8) - 1;
> + tst_res(TDEBUG, "%s: %llu", path, msr_highest_perf);
> +
> + if (msr_highest_perf != sysfs_highest_perf)
> + status = false;
> + }
> +
> + if (status)
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Sysfs and MSR values are equal");
> + else
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Highest performance values differ between sysfs and MSR");
I would print TFAIL in the for loop with CPU ID and both values.
And here print only final TPASS.
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .needs_kconfigs = (const char *const []) {
> + "CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB",
> + "CONFIG_X86_MSR",
Also even on this version I have:
high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c:31: TBROK: Failed to open FILE '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf' for reading: ENOENT (2)
on 6.18 kernel even I run modprobe msr
$ grep -e CONFIG_X86_MSR -e CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB /boot/config-6.18.*
CONFIG_X86_MSR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB=y
OTOH on 7.0.0-rc2 with the same config values autoloading worked.
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-18 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 13:02 [LTP] [PATCH v2] high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c: new test Piotr Kubaj
2026-03-18 13:52 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260318135230.GB18914@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=daniel.niestepski@intel.com \
--cc=helena.anna.dubel@intel.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=piotr.kubaj@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.ossowski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox