From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 283C61098797 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946133E55BF for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:10:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96EF33D067A for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:09:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CC510006D2 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:09:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7C55BDF3; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:09:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1774019392; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R2PvVnkFND1LdZ8dY0YRnqi0iy5SYzGEGqHrxTfKiWw=; b=aeN6k7qg7mCgGRq1bhGQKNAEqVSBXtJ4T5H1G6/eq0ozFUvQamXMEp5tLkQT0fYMqF5zhJ //bVoS9vLKryO9K2DwFecyz2+FpOhCllWCOYrXF4N0kxaVU6GD9a/i74eChe1aAgo0JEv2 EZ2gN+4JjWCFlowTedrWtbwB4ALlR84= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1774019392; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R2PvVnkFND1LdZ8dY0YRnqi0iy5SYzGEGqHrxTfKiWw=; b=zS6nTU1Qf9Ig8wXojTS7jqbgVD6t6l7HhH6AoYms/prWs8ahPmstzVICdUl20T7bk2682G TwmHvoZLDjHjEjCg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=aeN6k7qg; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=zS6nTU1Q DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1774019392; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R2PvVnkFND1LdZ8dY0YRnqi0iy5SYzGEGqHrxTfKiWw=; b=aeN6k7qg7mCgGRq1bhGQKNAEqVSBXtJ4T5H1G6/eq0ozFUvQamXMEp5tLkQT0fYMqF5zhJ //bVoS9vLKryO9K2DwFecyz2+FpOhCllWCOYrXF4N0kxaVU6GD9a/i74eChe1aAgo0JEv2 EZ2gN+4JjWCFlowTedrWtbwB4ALlR84= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1774019392; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R2PvVnkFND1LdZ8dY0YRnqi0iy5SYzGEGqHrxTfKiWw=; b=zS6nTU1Qf9Ig8wXojTS7jqbgVD6t6l7HhH6AoYms/prWs8ahPmstzVICdUl20T7bk2682G TwmHvoZLDjHjEjCg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A166C4286F; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id /oRGJj9jvWkdZQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:09:51 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:09:45 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Wei Gao Message-ID: <20260320150945.GA160532@pevik> References: <20260128002828.424-1-wegao@suse.com> <20260226022536.20175-1-wegao@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260226022536.20175-1-wegao@suse.com> X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:replyto,suse.cz:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7C7C55BDF3 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] mseal02: Handle multiple errnos for 32-bit compat mode X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, > In 32-bit compat mode, the overflow_size (calculated using a 32-bit ULONG_MAX) > does not cause a 64-bit integer wrap-around when added to the start address. > Consequently, the kernel see valid range that points to unmapped space, returning > ENOMEM instead of the expected EINVAL. Also LGTM. Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp