From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lib: tst_kconfig: Add runtime checks
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:44:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326154421.GA7157@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acVE76yDEM8pymPW@yuki.lan>
> Hi!
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > nit: please use /* */ otherwise checkpatch complains.
> Hmm, so apparently kernel has a bit crazy rule that the SPDX has to be
> between /* */ in headers and start with // in C sources. Because of some
> tooling that parses kernel headers couldn't handle //.
Yes:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/license-rules.html#license-identifier-syntax
If a specific tool cannot handle the standard comment style, then the
appropriate comment mechanism which the tool accepts shall be used. This is
the reason for having the “/* */” style comment in C header files. There was
build breakage observed with generated .lds files where ‘ld’ failed to parse
the C++ comment. This has been fixed by now, but there are still older
assembler tools which cannot handle C++ style comments.
=> older assembler tools.
> I do not think that there will be any tooling parsing LTP internal
> headers. Maybe we can silence that rule in checkpatch?
I'd prefer to keep changes in our vendored checkpatch pl to bare minimum
to not complicate updating. Unfortunately there is a single tag
SPDX_LICENSE_TAG for many checkpatch errors. It'd be great if this could be
configurable.
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-05 13:57 [LTP] [PATCH] lib: tst_kconfig: Add runtime checks Cyril Hrubis
2026-02-05 17:47 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-06 7:58 ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-02-06 8:23 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-06 12:23 ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-03-26 14:09 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-03-26 14:16 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-03-26 16:39 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-06 8:23 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-06 8:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-02-06 9:31 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-06 9:37 ` Petr Vorel
2026-02-06 9:45 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-02-06 10:31 ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-26 14:38 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-03-26 15:44 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-03-11 8:59 ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-24 8:33 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-26 14:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-26 14:40 Cyril Hrubis
2026-03-26 15:15 ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-27 7:02 ` Li Wang via ltp
2026-03-27 11:06 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326154421.GA7157@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox