From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC0D10A88E0 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EAE3CF2B9 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:39:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF98D3C0424 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:39:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 228CE6005C9 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:39:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDDA5BE2F; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:39:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1774543173; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gmEzJKeKa5IhV5+jPB52opO6699JzoiT5vQCRGCFY1g=; b=PSYUNB9OqIuh8q8Qcz4a+cdx9cr24xFlD1+nV1/LpbFKagEN3W+6q6gQPAE1Uzckrz/g92 y/Mi7dq6lAR4RFeitfN0DTAo2shWyKTuvmq93+Aj2lXwmGBZk+xccKuadd2weNUyryB8Gh jKAh0ZaQHG4kDm+wY6SJyco2Jewjj84= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1774543173; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gmEzJKeKa5IhV5+jPB52opO6699JzoiT5vQCRGCFY1g=; b=TUvUTmJk6vIpRSFnE6Q+10W0DriaBBVP5xmekgLvKKamnl1dng8qMwDppxxGs9EYKJOgJN kFK+BKFPUiOkGtCQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1774543173; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gmEzJKeKa5IhV5+jPB52opO6699JzoiT5vQCRGCFY1g=; b=PSYUNB9OqIuh8q8Qcz4a+cdx9cr24xFlD1+nV1/LpbFKagEN3W+6q6gQPAE1Uzckrz/g92 y/Mi7dq6lAR4RFeitfN0DTAo2shWyKTuvmq93+Aj2lXwmGBZk+xccKuadd2weNUyryB8Gh jKAh0ZaQHG4kDm+wY6SJyco2Jewjj84= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1774543173; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gmEzJKeKa5IhV5+jPB52opO6699JzoiT5vQCRGCFY1g=; b=TUvUTmJk6vIpRSFnE6Q+10W0DriaBBVP5xmekgLvKKamnl1dng8qMwDppxxGs9EYKJOgJN kFK+BKFPUiOkGtCQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B459D4A0A3; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id CouzKkVhxWlGNAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:39:33 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:39:28 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20260326163928.GA11710@pevik> References: <20260205135724.23772-1-chrubis@suse.cz> <20260205174756.GA338897@pevik> <20260206082303.GA364017@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lib: tst_kconfig: Add runtime checks X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > > IMHO that's why ssh supports multiple '-v', e.g. '-v -v -v' or '-vvv' > > > instead of > > > -v2 or -v3). > > > Anyway I'd prefer solving this somehow in the code so that users don't > > > have to > > > bother about log levels, but I have no idea how. Maybe yet another enum > > > tst_res_flags member? Because aa5a6fcdcd skipped messages, which are likely > > > useful when run by child process (the test), but not by library process. > > > And I > > > want to print message which is always run by library process. Maybe to > > > have some > > > #define in source code, which would force logging even for library > > > process? (not > > > sure what will be needed more often). > > This is something worth thinking about carefully, btw, next week is > > our spring festival hoday. I maybe reply you a bit later :). > Did we reach any conclusion here? > I think that we should implement different debug levels in LTP and drop I guess this was implemented in: cfeefc5114 ("lib: Extend -D flag to support multiple debug levels") I also Cced you with minor fix warning on LTP_ENABLE_DEBUG= > LTP_QUIET in the process. Does that sounds reasonable? I planned to merge LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT and LTP_QUIET functionality into single variable [1]. Let's keep the discussion there. Kind regards, Petr [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260325145243.daqrazagomckexgj@lida.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com/ -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp