From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4321310A88E5 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1DC3CF08F for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:42:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 546203C2B27 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:42:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E7860192C for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:42:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07C64D3DE; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:42:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1774543351; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3SpDAfsWpzpkbmOxpR/N8ArBatb6weKRmVJf+xiBYhQ=; b=dV/f6p7NTTO3lLf+Yhz+KuAsdT3RBhYS/ij95Hl9S3eVdEPJAz4dtV+WqM4kX8+hOWCWj+ PDPHZYED55jx5bxDjHHnlqRDuS9k2IbjqikmXzVQXQGmcddGgx3Xv23j5bheympihIpqDX 7i4QKuUGYpB63Xpjk7GoFxymS4xRhUM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1774543351; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3SpDAfsWpzpkbmOxpR/N8ArBatb6weKRmVJf+xiBYhQ=; b=f+stPMnDLD0ZFpz1RNZ1bRPRxDullSxOcdm3ucBuZEMoy4K957wgQH6uuQtnQXKW7JslTQ aOFEfKkA2xlwymDw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1774543350; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3SpDAfsWpzpkbmOxpR/N8ArBatb6weKRmVJf+xiBYhQ=; b=q/9E1bE3TQT6Itf1FFaGZSm2zXfZCHzMzeqrDEV+/7EcWeOQc0eMfxk1IRzllLFcZezG9G Nm5tt8ZiyNeZPAddOpsgixLHPwFw6vzM164tWZU429CUwr4Nan5qErwSuL7Sn8GjTKvnmw GrmT28/dpjXitcfFbBdracL8pAuAEQo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1774543350; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3SpDAfsWpzpkbmOxpR/N8ArBatb6weKRmVJf+xiBYhQ=; b=zb2ew4o7Kw15cQT6dM0g+Cds/31y2VwAb8A9SRNqUA0T64dPZwll4OPao1xZat465klPRl EEPZ5zV3ZwA2DFDw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 170594A0A3; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 28x1AvZhxWkiNwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:42:30 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:42:23 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Cermak Message-ID: <20260326164223.GB11710@pevik> References: <20260324140938.nxlzn5f2f6iakrm5@lida.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> <20260325090648.diugdugszgd3inuo@lida.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> <20260325091003.GA86256@pevik> <20260325092156.3sxnn26nlejzzygn@lida.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> <20260325094215.aiv3he5pdgm2v4fn@lida.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> <20260325135723.GA121486@pevik> <20260325145243.daqrazagomckexgj@lida.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260325145243.daqrazagomckexgj@lida.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [Valgrind-developers] [RFC PATCH 1/1] LTP tests: Run without LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT=1 X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > On Wed 2026-03-25 14:57 , Petr Vorel wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > That sounds reasonable to me. Which one would you prefer to > > > > > > keep? I'm inclined to suggest keeping LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT > > > > > > and dropping LTP_QUIET but no really strong preference on my > > > > > > side. Thoughts? > > > > > Maybe we can finally implement proper debug levels in LTP. E.g. hide > > > > > TINFO and TWARN messages with debug level 0 and default to debug level > > > > > 1. With debug level 2 we would show TDEBUG as well and with debug level > > > > > 3 we would show TDEBUG messages for library too. > > > > That would require running valgrind tests with something like > > > > debug level -1 ;) because what LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT actually > > > > does is that it hides testrun specific output like e.g. testrun > > > > specific addresses, temporary file names etc. > > > The LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT would have to stay, but the LTP_QUITE would > > > have been replaced by different debug levels. > > I thought just remove LTP_QUITE and control everything with > > LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT. > Sounds fine, Petr. For Valgrind testing, the functionality of > both LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT and LTP_QUIET is useful. But > there's no need to control the two features independently. > Merging the functionality under one controlling env var works > perfectly fine from the Valgrind testsuite perspective. I prefer to keep LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT as variable name (with merged functionality of both). 1) We have LTP_ENABLE_DEBUG, so one would expect LTP_ENABLE_DEBUG and LTP_QUIET are mutually exclusive. 2) IMHO it's more about the reproducibility of the results. Kind regards, Petr > Thanks, > Martin -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp