public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Test Project <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/1] editorconfig: add consistent formatting rules for LTP
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:25:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327182548.GA1120166@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acbEef_Kk8OMpHAI@li-276bd24c-2dcc-11b2-a85c-945b6f05615c.ibm.com>

...
> > Would it work if kirk has it's own .editorconfig? I mean, it should have anyway,
> > but if it will be applied on it as a submodule.

> > Kind regards,
> > Petr
> Hi Petr,

> In upstream LTP, kirk is actually included as a git submodule at
> `tools/kirk` (see `.gitmodules`), so having kirk carry its own
> `.editorconfig` is a natural fit.

> EditorConfig is directory-hierarchical: editors look for `.editorconfig`
> files from the file’s directory upwards, and the closest matching
> settings override parent ones. If kirk’s `.editorconfig` sets `root =
> true`, the lookup stops at the submodule root, so LTP’s top-level rules
> won’t affect files inside `tools/kirk`.

+1 (this was my question), thanks for info. Hopefully this is widely supported
feature (I haven't found it on the wiki).

> Alternatively, if one prefer a single policy file, one could keep
> everything in LTP’s top-level `.editorconfig` and add a dedicated
> override section like `[tools/kirk/**]`.

Thanks for info. That would not work because the primary development is in kirk
repo, let's have the config there.

Kind regards,
Petr

> Kind regards,
> Jan

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-27 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 13:03 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/1] editorconfig: add consistent formatting rules for LTP Jan Polensky
2026-03-27 10:53 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-27 12:33   ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-27 13:39     ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-27 17:43       ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-27 18:25         ` Jan Polensky
2026-03-27 18:59           ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-27 15:29   ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-27 17:55     ` Jan Polensky
2026-03-27 18:25       ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-03-30  7:23     ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-31 19:59       ` Jan Polensky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260327182548.GA1120166@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=japo@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox