From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Jinseok Kim <always.starving0@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5] close02: add test for double close EBADF
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:41:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422114126.GD402660@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421144246.2046-1-always.starving0@gmail.com>
Hi Jinseok,
> Verify that calling close() on an already closed file descriptor fails
> with EBADF.
> This test adds coverage for a common state transition case where a
> previously valid file descriptor becomes invalid after close().
> Signed-off-by: Jinseok Kim <always.starving0@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Change file descriptor as static
Well, I asked for static pointer.
> - Link to v4 : https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260416125554.2920-1-always.starving0@gmail.com
> Changes in v4:
> - Remove enum, add fd/expected errno in tcases, and move preparation
> to setup().
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260413165457.1349-1-always.starving0@gmail.com
> Changes in v3:
> - Add O_RDWR flag to SAFE_OPEN
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260411110405.7330-1-always.starving0@gmail.com
> Changes in v2:
> - Add additional test coverage to close02 instead of creating a separate
> close03 test.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260406133134.17238-2-always.starving0@gmail.com
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/close/close02.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/close/close02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/close/close02.c
> index 617c48237..a48570d12 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/close/close02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/close/close02.c
> @@ -5,17 +5,46 @@
> */
> /*\
> - * Call close(-1) and expects it to return EBADF.
> + * Verify :manpage:`close(2)` failure cases:
> + *
> + * 1) close(-1) returns EBADF.
> + * 2) closing the same fd twice returns EBADF on the second call.
> */
> #include <errno.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +
> #include "tst_test.h"
> -static void run(void)
> +static int fd_closed = -1;
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> + const char *desc;
> + int fd;
ie instead of "int fd" define:
int *fd;
> + int exp_errno;
> +} tcases[] = {
> + { "close(-1)", -1, EBADF },
> + { "close same fd twice", -1, EBADF },
> +};
> +
> +static void verify_close(unsigned int i)
> {
> - TST_EXP_FAIL(close(-1), EBADF);
> + struct tcase *tc = &tcases[i];
> +
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(close(tc->fd), tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + fd_closed = SAFE_OPEN("close02", O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0600);
> +
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd_closed);
> + tcases[1].fd = fd_closed;
We're getting there but not yet :). My point was not to assign file descriptor
here in the setup function, but above in tcases[] array. For that you need to
define in struct tcases "int *fd" (i.e. pointer) instead of "int fd".
I pointed in v4 testcases/kernel/syscalls/bind/bind01.c, which uses
int *socket_fd, could you do it that way (use pointer)?
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 13:30 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] close: remove unused headers and fix minor style issues Jinseok Kim
2026-04-06 13:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] close: add test for double close EBADF Jinseok Kim
2026-04-09 8:15 ` Petr Vorel
2026-04-11 11:04 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Jinseok Kim
2026-04-13 4:33 ` Li Wang
2026-04-13 11:30 ` Petr Vorel
2026-04-13 16:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Jinseok Kim
2026-04-13 18:04 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-04-13 20:45 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Petr Vorel
2026-04-16 12:55 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] close02: " Jinseok Kim
2026-04-16 13:44 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-04-17 0:01 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Li Wang
2026-04-17 11:56 ` Petr Vorel
2026-04-21 14:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5] " Jinseok Kim
2026-04-21 15:16 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-04-22 11:41 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-04-09 8:08 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] close: remove unused headers and fix minor style issues Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260422114126.GD402660@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=always.starving0@gmail.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox