From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 528C6FB44BC for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 06:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0B63E2587 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5CB03E18DC for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3790200ADE for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:31:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325895BD1E; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 06:31:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1777012298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F8nAl8Y8QSVZzHYuwZq8JHdSwdY/cGFLchhM3mzsTPQ=; b=R19XU+psiU5GmXXhGq5w4XimBYfNVO2o7vse0Y3/TPZXHBv2afnAlMtK6uuJAFAXEcWApT WgpLG+mJaZ24pXcysYspEGXp846G7St/VY4iWna6iNLq+R7Vu0QbzItZQLp9RnGJj3+eCZ IOg4EWbK/7Ko5EWv4FNPINwbaXWPg5U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1777012298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F8nAl8Y8QSVZzHYuwZq8JHdSwdY/cGFLchhM3mzsTPQ=; b=459ERU6DnzWfaZoJU5EsAyDZ4RfX54WnhZ89T3h/0T/nJI6vJy2igD7P2kWdv5RMdGaTcF skSgFjVINi8a/XCw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=R19XU+ps; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=459ERU6D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1777012298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F8nAl8Y8QSVZzHYuwZq8JHdSwdY/cGFLchhM3mzsTPQ=; b=R19XU+psiU5GmXXhGq5w4XimBYfNVO2o7vse0Y3/TPZXHBv2afnAlMtK6uuJAFAXEcWApT WgpLG+mJaZ24pXcysYspEGXp846G7St/VY4iWna6iNLq+R7Vu0QbzItZQLp9RnGJj3+eCZ IOg4EWbK/7Ko5EWv4FNPINwbaXWPg5U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1777012298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F8nAl8Y8QSVZzHYuwZq8JHdSwdY/cGFLchhM3mzsTPQ=; b=459ERU6DnzWfaZoJU5EsAyDZ4RfX54WnhZ89T3h/0T/nJI6vJy2igD7P2kWdv5RMdGaTcF skSgFjVINi8a/XCw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5DC593AE; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 06:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id F4fuAUoO62mzEAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 24 Apr 2026 06:31:38 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:31:32 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: ltp@lists.linux.it Message-ID: <20260424063132.GE462697@pevik> References: <20260424060543.462475-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.com:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:replyto,suse.cz:email]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 325895BD1E X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] ioctl_pidfd06: Update kernel version X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Li, [ Discussion => Cc Cyril and Jan ] > Hi Petr, Wei, > Petr Vorel wrote: > > Kernel commit ab89060fbc92e ("pidfs: return -EREMOTE when PIDFD_GET_INFO > > is called on another ns") from v7.0 was backported into stable/LTS > > kernels v6.18.14 (7446125afb6d9) and v6.19.10 (2920abaf56c09). > Is this backport just a single stable kernel or a range of version? It was backported into 6.18 stable (in v6.18.14) and in 6.19 (in v6.19.10). > > Reported-by: Wei Gao > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > > --- > > testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd06.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd06.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd06.c > > index 0f24d4741f..cc66d54cf4 100644 > > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd06.c > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd06.c > > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void setup(void) > > if (!ioctl_pidfd_info_exit_supported()) > > tst_brk(TCONF, "PIDFD_INFO_EXIT is not supported by ioctl()"); > > - if (tst_kvercmp(7, 0, 0) >= 0) > > + if (tst_kvercmp(6, 18, 14) >= 0) > What will happen if this test is run on kernel range: v6.19.0 ~ v6.19.9? FYI I haven't tested that, but it should fail on 6.18.0..v6.18.13 and on v6.19.0..v6.19.9 due missing backport. I'd assume that's correct, because on stable/LTS we should IMHO be more strict to ensure it behaves as expected. WDYT? Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp