Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com
To: Darren Chang <chihsheng@google.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] syscalls/xattr: Add runtime probe for socket xattr backports
Date: Mon,  1 Jun 2026 16:03:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601160400.4003-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601151400.4024541-1-chihsheng@google.com>

Hi Darren,

Thank you for this patch. The overall approach — using a runtime probe to
detect backported socket xattr support rather than relying solely on the
version check — is correct and useful for Android downstream kernels.

A couple of issues to fix before merging:

---

[COMMIT MESSAGE]

> was merged in v7.1.0

> strictly expect EPERM for sockets on kernels < 7.1.0.

Kernel mainline releases are tagged as "v7.1", not "v7.1.0". The sublevel
".0" is not part of the release tag. Please replace "v7.1.0" → "v7.1" and
"7.1.0" → "7.1" throughout the commit message.

---

[testcases/kernel/syscalls/fsetxattr/fsetxattr02.c]

> +		if (socket_idx != -1) {
> +			if (fsetxattr(tc[socket_idx].fd, tc[socket_idx].key,
> +				      tc[socket_idx].value, tc[socket_idx].size,
> +				      tc[socket_idx].flags) == 0) {
> +
> +				tst_res(TINFO, "Socket xattr support detected (backport)");

Blank line between the opening brace and the first statement. Linux kernel
coding style does not permit blank lines immediately after an opening '{'.
Please remove the blank line.

Also, the inline code comment (line just added in setup()) reads:

> +	 * merged in 7.1.0 mainline, but might be backported.

Same version notation issue: "7.1.0" → "7.1".

---

[testcases/kernel/syscalls/setxattr/setxattr02.c]

> +		if (setxattr(SOCK, XATTR_TEST_KEY, XATTR_TEST_VALUE,
> +			     XATTR_TEST_VALUE_SIZE, XATTR_CREATE) == 0) {
> +
> +			tst_res(TINFO, "Socket xattr support detected (backport)");

Same blank-line-after-brace issue as in fsetxattr02.c. Remove the blank
line.

Also:

> +	 * merged in 7.1.0 mainline, but might be backported.

"7.1.0" → "7.1".

---

Verdict: Needs revision

Regards,
LTP AI Reviewer

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-01 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-01 10:13 [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/xattr: Add runtime probe for socket xattr backports Darren Chang via ltp
2026-06-01 13:35 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-01 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Darren Chang via ltp
2026-06-01 16:03   ` linuxtestproject.agent [this message]
2026-06-01 16:53 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Darren Chang via ltp
2026-06-01 20:26   ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-02  1:07   ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Darren Chang via ltp
2026-06-02  4:06     ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-03 10:34     ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260601160400.4003-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com \
    --to=linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com \
    --cc=chihsheng@google.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox