Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] tst_test.sh: TCONF on xfrm algorithms rejected via netlink extack
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:46:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710074624.GA1164029@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2241dfd8-b2f6-431f-9ced-604e7533a791@suse.com>

Hi Avinesh,

> Hi Petr,

> Thank for the review.
Yw!

> > > diff --git a/testcases/lib/tst_test.sh b/testcases/lib/tst_test.sh
> > > index 2a83c17a5efb..8701bb390388 100644
> > > --- a/testcases/lib/tst_test.sh
> > > +++ b/testcases/lib/tst_test.sh
> > > @@ -266,13 +266,18 @@ TST_RTNL_CHK()
> > >   	local msg1="RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented"
> > >   	local msg2="RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported"
> > >   	local msg3="RTNETLINK answers: Protocol not supported"
> > > +	# Since v6.1 the kernel reports an unknown/removed xfrm algorithm via
> > > +	# netlink extack (-ENOSYS + NL_SET_ERR_MSG), which iproute2 prints as
> > > +	# "Error: Requested AUTH algorithm not found."
> > > +	local msg4="Requested .* algorithm not found"
> > >   	local output="$($@ 2>&1 || echo 'LTP_ERR')"
> > nit: we have in $output also "LTP_ERR" in the end (on error)...

> > > -	local msg
> > > +	local msg match

> > >   	echo "$output" | grep -q "LTP_ERR" || return 0

> > > -	for msg in "$msg1" "$msg2" "$msg3"; do
> > > -		echo "$output" | grep -q "$msg" && tst_brk TCONF "'$@': $msg"
> > > +	for msg in "$msg1" "$msg2" "$msg3" "$msg4"; do
> > > +		match=$(echo "$output" | grep "$msg") && \
> > > +				tst_brk TCONF "'$@': $match"
> > ... now we print error message also with "LTP_ERR" in the end.
> > I wonder if we should bother with removing it, e.g. with sed:

> > -		match=$(echo "$output" | grep "$msg") && \
> > +		match=$(echo "$output" | grep "$msg" | sed 's/LTP_ERR$//') && \
> I tested my patch, and I see atleast the TCONF path is fine, it does not
> print 'LTP_ERR' -

> tcp_ipsec 1 TCONF: 'ip xfrm state add src 10.0.0.2 dst 10.0.0.1 spi 0x1000
> proto esp enc serpent
> 0x5a78724d91fbdab8873e6bc7933816f9bb58b3da90ec2a6e0346ba41c6c18c63 auth
> hmac(rmd160) 0x4b53e65cb2e928d34c0db747782dda0457a3e4ed mode transport sel
> src 10.0.0.2 dst 10.0.0.1': Error: Requested AUTH algorithm not found.

> but we will have it printed in TRBOK cases, as it was before this patch
> also:
> tcp_ipsec 1 TBROK: ip xfrm state add src 10.0.0.2 dst 10.0.0.1 spi 0x1000
> proto esp enc serpent
> 0x40e68502109572c1014d131358bcc38b45ae02e5bbdae35752de32c2b6c68a6e auth
> hmac(rmd160) 0x87658785bf2ffc586ce49e4d31318246429063ef mode tunnel sel src
> 10.0.0.2 dst 10.0.0.1 failed: Error: Requested AUTH algorithm not found.
> LTP_ERR

Good point! OK, in that case I've merged your solution as is and post a
fix for this minor issue myself.

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-04  8:57 [LTP] [PATCH] tst_test.sh: TCONF on xfrm algorithms rejected via netlink extack Avinesh Kumar via ltp
2026-07-04  9:27 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-08 14:01 ` [LTP] [PATCH] " Petr Vorel
2026-07-10  7:34   ` Avinesh Kumar via ltp
2026-07-10  7:46     ` Petr Vorel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260710074624.GA1164029@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=avinesh.kumar@suse.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox