Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Switch to patchwork.kernel.org

[Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>]

Hi Li, all,

> Andrea Cervesato wrote:

> > > I would keep it around at least for a year or two, I sometimes look up
> > > old patches there.

> > that looks like a really long period of time. lore.kernel.org/ltp/
> > is not enough?

> I guess Cyril means to look back the history of patch discussion when needed.

Well, for the patch history we have LTP ML archive [1] and lore (has longer
history than patchwork [2]). Although patch view in patchwork might be easier to
read.

I meant something different: people have probably sent LTP patchwork ozlabs
instance links to other, put in bugzilla etc. Patchwork use Message-id, therefore
patch link [3] can be easily converted to lore [4]. Patch comment [5] don't.
That's why I'd keep abandoned LTP instance for some time, but maybe we just don't care.
Obviously keeping it around depends on ozlabs maintainers decision.

> Or, can we tar the mail discussion for recent years and store it somewhere?

FYI we already have history in git as an public-inbox [6]:
git clone https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/

> Anyway, for the patch:

> Reviewed-by: Li Wang <li.wang@linux.dev>

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/?t=20180216133201
[3] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20260731054548.133241-1-pvorel@suse.cz/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260731054548.133241-1-pvorel@suse.cz/
[5] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/comment/3731798/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/_/text/mirror/

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp