From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA267C5B572 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86123D0F9B for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:45:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292F03C6EDD for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:44:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C0DB100095B for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:44:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7562F1F79E; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:44:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1787633078; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9skd5+9cIT/c7uRKuNm26Fhk4Fzs0mO6dfppmkjLXYQ=; b=1dULXNBz4zH913W4wUL4IUCWxQ4R9RgxYiAhIxYeLz79RFKZxvdo4r8gBKztyX8w3piMue AQP3Hpcd4RX6b+JXnIo/xl1/EYgYpwbqoNY5cgg48Zm+4I1a0NVDPmJFDVZbG2n6CygM70 2k/0gPOX37jvgNcWwu+YGJXepzwnlyI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1787633078; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9skd5+9cIT/c7uRKuNm26Fhk4Fzs0mO6dfppmkjLXYQ=; b=Z8JekwTpJ1NNzxIGt+KrAtJBmrUOHf8DumCETR0ZyPjnV/ePt5yz8wXzhKDNZmyWYUT1RG XssGLrmB5XPxIrAQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1787633074; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9skd5+9cIT/c7uRKuNm26Fhk4Fzs0mO6dfppmkjLXYQ=; b=DPtbjt5SX9hUkiyNGpFD5z49xCpbxd5HsFG2xLTBGg96QZt7CF1uOG2J/Y/7j7/zyxyniV j2+ZwY0rCnbjdiAXT5NkkHJSFsccQutA62WCt1lkyU1M1ltNpaiBOifsBCqmrgdJgsPXBj B5p8CgP7UMHwXhs/E+pIjdhYiYPfSb4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1787633074; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9skd5+9cIT/c7uRKuNm26Fhk4Fzs0mO6dfppmkjLXYQ=; b=9gphUR2SqYea5DfgdmiUnv6kN6QLpY7F1njugPx5Lnc8M8x9Kk4M4yv5Lr625L1pj7qB8f SQ8j2VSU8aVU6xDg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54FE813331; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id nlwHE7IdjWp3NgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:44:34 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:44:33 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com Message-ID: <20260825044433.GB22725@pevik> References: <20260821200620.902699-1-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <20260821202613.4033-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260821202613.4033-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:email,suse.cz:replyto]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] ima_selinux.sh: test2 assumes CONFIG_IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE is configured X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Mimi, > Hi Mimi, > On August 21, 2026, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > ima_selinux.sh: test2 assumes CONFIG_IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE is configured > > + if ! tst_check_kconfigs "CONFIG_IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE=y"; then > > + tst_res TPASS "Duplicate \"selinux-state\" record missing (CONFIG_IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE not set)" I would suggest the same, it makes sense to use TCONF to make it visible that it's not an error but OTOH it was not actually tested due CONFIG_IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE not set. If you don't mind, I'd change TPASS to TCONF before merge (or feel free to send v2 with this change yourself with my Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel ). Thanks for the fix! Kind regards, Petr > Could this path report TCONF instead? Without duplicate records, test2 cannot > compare the current enforcing state with a fresh measurement and returns > before checking the remaining state fields. TPASS turns this untested > configuration into a successful test result. > Verdict - Needs revision > --- > Note: > The agent can sometimes produce false positives although often its > findings are genuine. If you find issues with the review, please > comment this email or ignore the suggestions. > Regards, > LTP AI Reviewer -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp