Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Gao via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v1] memcontrol03: Bind to single CPU on systems with 64KB pagesize
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:23:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929022340.524-1-wegao@suse.com> (raw)

On multi-CPU systems with 64KB page size (e.g. ppc64le), memcontrol03
intermittently fails with over-reclaim of protected pagecache under
trunk_B:

  memcontrol03.c:104: TINFO: Child 142113 in trunk_G: Allocating anon: 150994944
  memcontrol03.c:121: TPASS: Child 142113 exited
  memcontrol03.c:214: TPASS: Expect: (A/B memory.current=54394880) ~= 52428800
  ...
  memcontrol03.c:104: TINFO: Child 142114 in trunk_G: Allocating anon: 174063616
  memcontrol03.c:116: TPASS: Child 142114 killed by OOM
  memcontrol03.c:230: TFAIL: Expect: (A/B memory.current=43319296) ~= 52428800

In the kernel, per-CPU charge batching (MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH = 64 pages)
caches up to 64 * 64KB = 4MB per CPU in memcg_stock. On a multi-CPU
system, allocating memory across CPUs allows cached stock charges to
accumulate in ancestor trunk_A (up to 4MB * nr_cpus, e.g. 16MB on a
4-CPU machine). Because trunk_A has memory.max = 200M, this extra stock
pressure forces the reclaimer to evict pagecache in trunk_B down to
~35-43MB instead of the expected ~50MB. Simply enlarging the tolerance
rate further is not good idea.

Bind the test process to a single CPU in setup() when page size is
>= 64KB. This confines stock batching to a single CPU, preventing
multi-CPU stock inflation and ensuring reproducible reclaim behavior.

Signed-off-by: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
---
 .../kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c
index 96224c4ee..6007d5588 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c
@@ -235,6 +235,23 @@ static void test_memcg_min(void)
 	SAFE_UNLINK(TMPDIR"/tmpfile");
 }
 
+static void setup(void)
+{
+	if (getpagesize() >= 64 * 1024) {
+		cpu_set_t mask;
+		int cpu = sched_getcpu();
+
+		if (cpu < 0)
+			tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "sched_getcpu() failed");
+
+		tst_res(TINFO, "Page size >= 64KB, binding to CPU %d", cpu);
+		CPU_ZERO(&mask);
+		CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
+		if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask))
+			tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "sched_setaffinity() failed");
+	}
+}
+
 static void cleanup(void)
 {
 	cleanup_sub_groups();
@@ -243,6 +260,7 @@ static void cleanup(void)
 }
 
 static struct tst_test test = {
+	.setup = setup,
 	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.test_all = test_memcg_min,
 	.mount_device = 1,
-- 
2.55.0


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29  2:23 Wei Gao via ltp [this message]
2026-09-29  4:35 ` [LTP] memcontrol03: Bind to single CPU on systems with 64KB pagesize linuxtestproject.agent
2026-09-29 17:01 ` [LTP] [PATCH v1] " Michal Koutný via ltp
2026-09-30  3:53 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] memcontrol03, memcontrol04: Bind test process to a single CPU Wei Gao via ltp
2026-09-30  3:53   ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] memcontrol: Add bind_to_current_cpu() helper Wei Gao via ltp
2026-09-30  8:11     ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-09-30 11:25       ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-09-30  3:53   ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] memcontrol03, memcontrol04: Bind test process to a single CPU Wei Gao via ltp
     [not found] ` <20260929-second-foyer-87225078267f@there>
2026-09-30  3:55   ` [LTP] [PATCH v1] memcontrol03: Bind to single CPU on systems with 64KB pagesize Wei Gao via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260929022340.524-1-wegao@suse.com \
    --to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=wegao@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox