From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1592CA5FA7 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4653E9F72 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:00:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE87E3E5879 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:59:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE731400059 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:59:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B929F21BE0; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:59:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1790697581; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mRj6KzuHPTvTbWn2NYO2HL3SWuCYinJVwFlJGiTm2XY=; b=Mi3slMbEFhSyB4KMX1DaHL59NQE+Ue7g/67GYlORFjOUEom+MUQ+B4ee9tJv58/jw5xNrS YY1Vql2jbGDrW0gcaEc19E6aSxE+babaGYWEWhD0h9MFv2OZZh1gG6k/GXPXYRkAbAY07J K9l1FhCz/PIxZHmtGHSIM4xL3ffb0n8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1790697581; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mRj6KzuHPTvTbWn2NYO2HL3SWuCYinJVwFlJGiTm2XY=; b=YZfCVrc4KaPm+vtrvdvz+guYjN/3qhxxGmV9+eM/V58SIk3tddvinka078C+wbCJxwCxuE cRedgc60l9hH+iCA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1790697577; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mRj6KzuHPTvTbWn2NYO2HL3SWuCYinJVwFlJGiTm2XY=; b=u5tu5q3Y3N2lEvqNGoIPB/gy/Zo8ODvaijGt8fT6LAgPGZfeLuCNhDa3DcL6aKd7bFAbqp 9ag3zDMk5Gd9jzlZJLss4WObwMxpYiR+ZG8gKms87ZnoqMo2G15Qy76cfmZxrs3hq6H6jD qJv9yqPSgGT+wRmMti7gs/PgzzIcMCc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1790697577; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mRj6KzuHPTvTbWn2NYO2HL3SWuCYinJVwFlJGiTm2XY=; b=qhkGdMB6kdIwxyR3KswgWwokPD/iSNYBBZ4/si8UKuzPKht+DvNeX4o5JsL9GNwmKdmfn2 3iq3OlXKUFKdpmDw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA0D613777; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id DuDYKmjgu2q/QQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:59:36 +0000 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:59:35 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: ltp@lists.linux.it Message-ID: <20260929155935.GB2614679@pevik> References: <20260929141659.2513510-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260929141659.2513510-1-pvorel@suse.cz> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto,suse.cz:email,linaro.org:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto,suse.cz:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] lapi: Update syscalls numbers to v7.3-rc5 X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, > Updating syscalls should help fixing issue with sparc not working on > tst_clone(). > Reported-by: Anders Roxell > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > --- > It should be safe, but do we dare to merge before LTP release? > This tries to avoid workaround for sparc() > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/ltp/patch/20260929084253.3093742-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org/ > https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260929084253.3093742-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org/ > include/lapi/syscalls/arc.in | 3 + > include/lapi/syscalls/arm.in | 4 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/arm64.in | 3 + > include/lapi/syscalls/i386.in | 4 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/loongarch64.in | 3 + > include/lapi/syscalls/mips64.in | 5 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/mips64n32.in | 5 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/mipso32.in | 5 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/parisc.in | 4 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc.in | 4 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/powerpc64.in | 4 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/s390.in | 103 +++++++-------------------- Hm, this removes s390 31 bit support, which was removed in v6.19-rc1 8e0b986c59c67 ("s390: Remove compat support") Quoting the commit message, it gives me confidence, that nobody will miss these syscall numbers. But I should note that into the commit message. Kind regards, Petr There shouldn't be any 31 bit code around anymore that matters. Remove the compat layer support required to run 31 bit code. Reason for removal is code simplification and reduced test effort. Note that this comes without any deprecation warnings added to config options, or kernel messages, since most likely those would be ignored anyway. If it turns out there is still a reason to keep the compat layer this can be reverted at any time in the future. > include/lapi/syscalls/s390x.in | 5 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/sh.in | 4 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/sparc.in | 5 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/sparc64.in | 5 +- > include/lapi/syscalls/x86_64.in | 5 +- > 17 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp