From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
Cc: valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
Martin Cermak <mcermak@redhat.com>,
ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [Valgrind-developers] Suggested fix for the mremap03 syscall testcase
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:38:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261015083851.GA290292@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27AE9564-6115-491B-AE80-D9016EA7CDB5@suse.com>
Hi Martin, Andrea,
> Hi Martin,
> you are right. That’s a bug we didn’t spot during the test rewrite. Thanks.
Good catch, Martin, you're of course right => turned into proper patch and
merged.
valgrind ./mremap03
tst_test.c:1895: TINFO: Overall timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
--292799-- VALGRIND INTERNAL ERROR: Valgrind received a signal 11 (SIGSEGV) - exiting
--292799-- si_code=1; Faulting address: 0x8; sp: 0x1002ef2cc0
valgrind: the 'impossible' happened:
Killed by fatal signal
host stacktrace:
==292799== at 0x580AE3D3: ??? (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/memcheck-amd64-linux)
==292799== by 0x580A7ED9: ??? (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/memcheck-amd64-linux)
==292799== by 0x580A387A: ??? (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/memcheck-amd64-linux)
==292799== by 0x580A58A6: ??? (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/memcheck-amd64-linux)
==292799== by 0x58115088: ??? (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/memcheck-amd64-linux)
BTW testcase after fix still fails, but that's I suppose just expected valgrind
behavior on mmap(PROT_NONE), right?
valgrind ./mremap03
==292941== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==292941== Copyright (C) 2002-2026, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==292941== Using Valgrind-3.27.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==292941== Command: ./mremap03
==292941==
tst_test.c:2061: TINFO: LTP version: 20260930-20-gd494a8e1c9
...
tst_test.c:1895: TINFO: Overall timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
mremap03.c:42: TFAIL: mremap(bad_addr, memsize, newsize, MREMAP_MAYMOVE) expected EFAULT: EINVAL (22)
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 12:20 [LTP] Suggested fix for the mremap03 syscall testcase Martin Cermak via ltp
2026-10-14 16:42 ` [LTP] Fix " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-10-14 18:32 ` [LTP] Suggested fix for " Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-10-15 8:38 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-10-15 9:01 ` [LTP] [Valgrind-developers] " Martin Cermak via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261015083851.GA290292@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=mcermak@redhat.com \
--cc=valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox