From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] clone/clone08.c: check whether clone supports 7 arguments
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:10:52 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <256751357.13345901.1389276652247.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201401090851.42915.vapier@gentoo.org>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier@gentoo.org>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Thursday, 9 January, 2014 2:51:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] clone/clone08.c: check whether clone supports 7 arguments
>
> On Thursday 09 January 2014 08:23:48 Jan Stancek wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > > From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier@gentoo.org>
> > > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Sent: Thursday, 9 January, 2014 2:03:38 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] clone/clone08.c: check whether clone supports
> > > 7 arguments
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 08 January 2014 09:31:30 Zeng Linggang wrote:
> > > > +AC_DEFUN([LTP_CHECK_CLONE7ARGS],[
> > > > +AH_TEMPLATE(HAVE_CLONE7ARGS,
> > > > +[Define to 1 if clone() supports 7 arguments.])
> > > > +AC_MSG_CHECKING([for CLONE7ARGS])
> > > > +AC_TRY_LINK([#define _GNU_SOURCE
> > > > + #include <sched.h>
> > > > + #include <stdlib.h>],
> > > > + [
> > > > + #if !defined(__ia64__)
> > > > + clone(NULL, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > > > + #endif
> > > > + ],
> > > > + AC_DEFINE(HAVE_CLONE7ARGS) AC_MSG_RESULT(yes), AC_MSG_RESULT(no))
> > > > +])
> > >
> > > you aren't really testing for "clone takes 7 args", you're testing for
> > > "clone has varargs support". rename the define (and use _ in its name),
> > > and drop the
> > > ia64 check as it isn't needed.
> >
> > Why not? It should matter, according to clone(2) you should be using
> > __clone2() on ia64: ia64
> > On ia64, a different interface is used:
>
> exactly. why does a clone() test have any bearing at all on ia64 behavior ?
> the code that checks the define won't get used in the __ia64__ case, so
> having
> a define here is pointless.
I thought the check applies to whole ltp_clone, since that is what is called
by testcases checking this define.
Regards,
Jan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-09 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 9:29 [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/2] lib/cloner.c: add more args zenglg.jy
2013-12-23 1:11 ` Wanlong Gao
2014-01-07 14:09 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <1389181297.2879.11.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-01-08 13:20 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <1389191490.2879.27.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-01-08 15:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH] clone/clone08.c: check whether clone supports 7 arguments chrubis
[not found] ` <1389254938.2025.3.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-01-09 11:36 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <1389269411.2149.8.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-01-09 13:27 ` [LTP] [PATCH???v3] lib/cloner.c: add function ltp_clone7 when clone supports???7 arguments chrubis
[not found] ` <201401090947.12749.vapier@gentoo.org>
2014-01-09 15:04 ` chrubis
2014-01-09 16:37 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <629935924.13499645.1389289589284.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2014-01-09 18:08 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <201401091417.16506.vapier@gentoo.org>
2014-01-13 16:02 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <201401081447.46449.vapier@gentoo.org>
2014-01-09 11:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH] clone/clone08.c: check whether clone supports 7 arguments chrubis
[not found] ` <201401090803.39606.vapier@gentoo.org>
2014-01-09 13:09 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <201401090900.59568.vapier@gentoo.org>
2014-01-09 14:34 ` chrubis
2014-01-09 13:23 ` Jan Stancek
2014-01-09 13:51 ` Mike Frysinger
2014-01-09 14:10 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2014-01-09 14:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2014-01-09 14:39 ` chrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=256751357.13345901.1389276652247.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox