From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH] mm: rewrite mtest01 with new API
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 03:44:12 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <269593361.3808924.1551429852336.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2cx0mPzhgAUKq01_4JXOnanQjK79JqEdPZ5N0kpO4A_QA@mail.gmail.com>
----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:03 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe give it few days, so other people can respond, if they like/don't like
> > going in this direction.
> >
>
> Sure.
>
> Btw, I'm not going to use shared memory here since that probably make
> things more complicated.
> I guess just do remaining time check in the parent while loop is enough for
> the two OOM situations
> which I was mentioned in last mail.
>
> ==== mem_test() ======
> ...
>
> if (pid == 0)
> child_loop_alloc();
>
> /* waits in the loop for all children finish allocating*/
> while(pid_count < pid_cntr) {
> if (tst_timeout_remaining() < 15)
> break;
>
> sleep(1);
> }
>
> if (dowrite) {
> pre_free - post_free check...
This doesn't look very accurate. Other system processes can influence this.
Do we need to check it at all? If a child didn't complete allocation
it's not going to signal parent.
> } else {
> ...
> }
>
> kill children here..
>
> --
> Regards,
> Li Wang
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-01 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 7:40 [LTP] [RFC PATCH] mm: rewrite mtest01 with new API Li Wang
2019-02-28 22:08 ` Jan Stancek
2019-03-01 6:05 ` Li Wang
2019-03-01 8:03 ` Jan Stancek
2019-03-01 8:26 ` Li Wang
2019-03-01 8:44 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-03-05 7:04 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=269593361.3808924.1551429852336.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox