From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/ioctl_ns0[156]: align stack and wait for child
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:25:49 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <278919491.27726511.1560349549390.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612135929.GA3048@rei.lan>
----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > Test crashes (SIGBUS) when using child stack have been observed for
> > ioctl_ns01. Align stack to 64 bytes for all testcases using clone,
> > which should work for any arch.
>
> Looking at the rest of the test it seems that all of them use malloc()
> to allocate the child stack and depends on the libc to align the
> buffers, maybe it would be easier to change these tests to use malloc()
> as well.
Default alignment is not enough:
Alignment: 2 * sizeof(size_t) (default)
(i.e., 8 byte alignment with 4byte size_t). This suffices for
nearly all current machines and C compilers. However, you can
define MALLOC_ALIGNMENT to be wider than this if necessary.
I'm guessing most of tests cross M_MMAP_THRESHOLD, and get page alignment
from mmap. But should we rely on that?
How about posix_memalign()?
>
> > Add SIGCHLD to clone flags, so that LTP library can reap all children
> > and check their return code. Also check ltp_clone() return value.
> >
> > Suppress warning for unused *arg in child().
>
> The rest is OK.
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 10:25 [LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/ioctl_ns0[156]: align stack and wait for child Jan Stancek
2019-06-12 1:28 ` Li Wang
2019-06-12 13:59 ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-06-12 14:25 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-06-12 15:21 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=278919491.27726511.1560349549390.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox