From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Stancek Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:20:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] safe_macros: match oldlib SAFE_CLOSE with docs In-Reply-To: <20160713125117.GC2232@rei.scz.novell.com> References: <20160712135542.GD2651@rei.suse.cz> <1283099046.4208400.1468339858052.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <442527119.4450656.1468414366190.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20160713125117.GC2232@rei.scz.novell.com> Message-ID: <316514866.4459432.1468416001390.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cyril Hrubis" > To: "Jan Stancek" > Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it > Sent: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016 2:51:17 PM > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] safe_macros: match oldlib SAFE_CLOSE with docs > > Hi! > > > That was the plan, but I didn't get to that today. > > > > > > I was thinking syscalls as well, since most common failure seems > > > to be errno tests, trying to trigger EBADF, etc. > > > > > > I'll reply once I have results. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > I do not expect that this will break anything, but there it's a > > > > possibility. > > > > I ran syscalls (+small selection of other tests) on x86_64, ppc64le > > and s390x. Only failure was inotify06, but it turned out, that kernel > > didn't have a patch for this specific failure [1]. It failed with or > > without oldlib SAFE_CLOSE patch. inotify06 passed with 4.7.0-rc7+. > > Thanks for the testing. Patch is acked. Pushed. Regards, Jan > > -- > Cyril Hrubis > chrubis@suse.cz >