From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] network/busy_poll: make test results more stable
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 07:01:06 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35755633.671473.1467198066896.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467045057-19618-1-git-send-email-alexey.kodanev@oracle.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexey Kodanev" <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com>
> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Cc: "vasily isaenko" <vasily.isaenko@oracle.com>
> Sent: Monday, 27 June, 2016 6:30:57 PM
> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] network/busy_poll: make test results more stable
>
> Changing tcp network load from 'connect/request/response/close'
> to 'request/response'. Results will be more stable as we aren't
> closing/establishing tcp connection after 3 requests from client.
>
> There're other tests that do such stress testing so such test-case
> won't be removed.
>
> It'll also decrease test time by several times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com>
ACK.
As advertised my KVM guest running 4.5.0 shows more significant
difference between busy poll 0/50:
Without patch:
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : set low latency busy poll to 50
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : run tcp_fastopen with 'localhost', port '37532'
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : time spent is '25039' ms
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : set low latency busy poll to 0
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : run tcp_fastopen with 'localhost', port '61133'
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : time spent is '35203' ms
busy_poll01 1 TPASS : busy poll increased performance by '29' %
real 1m2.866s
user 0m1.542s
sys 1m5.937s
With patch:
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : set low latency busy poll to 50
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : run tcp_fastopen with 'localhost', port '30109'
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : time spent is '3874' ms
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : set low latency busy poll to 0
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : run tcp_fastopen with 'localhost', port '10440'
busy_poll01 1 TINFO : time spent is '12561' ms
busy_poll01 1 TPASS : busy poll increased performance by '70' %
real 0m19.006s
user 0m0.749s
sys 0m16.408s
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-29 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-27 16:30 [LTP] [PATCH] network/busy_poll: make test results more stable Alexey Kodanev
2016-06-29 11:01 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2016-06-29 13:47 ` Alexey Kodanev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35755633.671473.1467198066896.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox