From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Stancek Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:44:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] zram01: Fix on ppc64le In-Reply-To: <20170815092326.GA20715@rei.lan> References: <1485870273-26990-1-git-send-email-chrubis@suse.cz> <20170815092326.GA20715@rei.lan> Message-ID: <420182872.1608763.1502797492172.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it ----- Original Message ----- > Hi! > Looks like we went off-topic and the zram01.sh test wasn't fixed in the > end and it still fails on ppc64le. > > I guess I can prepare a patch that checks if there is enough free RAM > for a minimal Btrfs fs but I would still like to obtain the minimal size > from mkfs.btrfs. Does that sound reasonable? Do you mean these messages from mkfs.btrfs: "ERROR: minimum size for each btrfs device is 41943040" or some other way to find minimal supported size? Regards, Jan