From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A48C001DE for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C703CDB41 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:25:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3D183CC967 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 976F4237147 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:25:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16D81F8B2; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:25:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1690968341; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0xFMtxkS6hWbP1UeAam6GZo0DUxqM0NuJUd5T/zq+k8=; b=lKhLQ8DeFUN38VHGp4ihsZUxg8vKXrCn3elBj/AeVnPt7BJnK/yXVGkhGRicj4p2DMcscG 6h7TGctHTs5jkoEJCQxUeb2/1IiYfTDNSyoSExV5FopXdmoQpHm2Tz0whO8XdcX3fbbi0l 5xAP7aCc4SlNCftA4kRbqWHIPGNtBhw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1690968341; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0xFMtxkS6hWbP1UeAam6GZo0DUxqM0NuJUd5T/zq+k8=; b=WyD3lcS/P9NNbLc6IrVul7wUZbyT0sVBG2VNiO4tzqku+ZlLPuvqoqSede856izsl2OsOt Bsa7WQwCDx7grAAA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E1CA13909; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id m6llOxQhymRaYwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:25:40 +0000 From: Avinesh Kumar To: pvorel@suse.cz, Cyril Hrubis Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 14:55:39 +0530 Message-ID: <422745784.q2UjYaihZW@localhost> Organization: SUSE In-Reply-To: References: <20230719113906.22317-1-akumar@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/pipe08: Remove the test X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Cyril, Petr, On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 4:09:43 PM IST Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! > > > This test scenario of verifying SIGPIPE signal is being covered in > > syscalls/write05.c test. > > Hmm, this one is actually hard to figure out. Indeed the write test > implmenents the SIGPIPE case, however it would make more sense to have > the SIGPIPE test in syscalls/pipe/ directory instead. I guess that any > kernel developer that would like to use LTP for testing changes in > pipe() implementation would rather want to have the test under pipe/ > directory. > > Maybe we should keep the pipe08 test and remove the case from the > write05 test instead? Or should we keep both? Thank you for your feedback. Now I too think we can keep both, but you guys can decide. Please let me know, I can send the patch for pipe08 to convert to new API if we decide to keep it. -- Regards, Avinesh -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp