public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] [RFC] pselect01: Tune thresholds
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 06:03:50 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <495691788.11461692.1494842630946.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512141658.26810-1-chrubis@suse.cz>



----- Original Message -----
> +
> +/*
> + * The threshold per one syscall is computed as a sum of:
> + *
> + *  250 us                 - accomodates for context switches, etc.
> + *  2*monotonic_resolution - accomodates for granurality of the
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> + *  slack_per_scall        - 0.1% of the sleep capped on 100ms
> + *                           which is slack allowed in kernel
> + *
> + * We also allow for outliners, i.e. add some number to the threshold in
> case
> + * that the number of iteration is small. For large enoung number of
> iterations
> + * outliners are averaged out.
> + */
> +static int compute_threshold(long long requested_us, unsigned int
> iterations)
> +{
> +	unsigned int slack_per_scall = MIN(100000, requested_us / 1000);

Hi,

while looking at fs/select.c I noticed that it also takes
current->timer_slack_ns into account and uses that if 
slack is smaller. Would it make sense to add ...?
  slack_per_scall = MAX(slack_per_scall, prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK) / 1000);
The default is 50us, so maybe the 250us in formula covers this already?

v2 looks good to me, and my KVM guest ran test successfully for hours.

Regards,
Jan

> +
> +	return (250 + 2 * monotonic_resolution + slack_per_scall) * iterations
> +		+ (iterations > 1 ? 0 : 1500);
> +}
> +

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-15 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-12 14:16 [LTP] [PATCH v2] [RFC] pselect01: Tune thresholds Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-15 10:03 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2017-05-15 10:20   ` Xiao Yang
2017-05-15 13:15     ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-15 13:23       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-15 12:36   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-15 13:00     ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-15 13:13       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-15 13:16         ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-22  8:39         ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-22 12:04           ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-22 13:37             ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-22 13:19           ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-22 14:57             ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-22 15:15               ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-23  7:54                 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-23  9:16                   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-23  9:45                     ` Jan Stancek
2017-06-02 12:48                       ` Jan Stancek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=495691788.11461692.1494842630946.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox