From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Sharyathi Nagesh <sharyath@in.ibm.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, mbeeraka@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] Issue observed with chmod05, fchmod05 test cases
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:33:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A486E66.5050102@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A48667F.9050101@in.ibm.com>
Sharyathi Nagesh wrote:
> Hi
> I am observing this anomaly with these 2 test cases chmod05.c and
> fchmod05.c.
> These 2 test cases are written to test the POSIX standard which says:
>
> "If the calling process is not privileged (Linux: does not
> have the
> CAP_FSETID capability), and the group of the file does not
> match the
> effective group ID of the process or one of its
> supplementary group
> IDs, the S_ISGID bit will be turned off, but this will not
> cause an
> error to be returned."
>
>
> So the test case will try to setup a file in which the GID of the
> test/tmp file will be different from the effective group ID of the
> running process. But this criterion is found to be not sufficient
> condition for the clearing the S_ISGID bit of the file
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Ex:
> There are 2 users nobody (uid=99, gid=99) and bin (uid=1, gid=1)
> let as assume temporary file as /tmp/zxcv
>
> Test will Pass if
> Set UID/GID of /tmp/zxcv to nobody->uid & nobody->GID
> Set eUID/eGID of process to nobody->uid & bin->GID
>
> Test will Fail if
> Set UID/GID of /tmp/zxcv to nobody->uid & bin->GID
> Set eUID/eGID of process to nobody->uid & nobody->GID
>
> I verified supplementary group IDs for both 'nobody' and 'bin' and
> they are mutually exclusive and none of the other is supplementary
> group ID of the ID being tested
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Should we treat this as Test case issue or kernel bug?
The different of 'nobody' and 'bin' is bin->GID has the CAP_FSETID
capability, but nobody->GID has not, I think.
Regards.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-29 7:00 [LTP] Issue observed with chmod05, fchmod05 test cases Sharyathi Nagesh
2009-06-29 7:33 ` Wei Yongjun [this message]
2009-06-29 10:30 ` Sharyathi Nagesh
2009-07-02 4:34 ` Sharyathi Nagesh
2009-07-20 11:25 ` Sharyathi Nagesh
2009-07-20 15:56 ` Garrett Cooper
2009-07-21 8:57 ` Sharyathi Nagesh
2009-07-30 18:28 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-31 1:38 ` Sharyathi Nagesh
2009-07-31 1:54 ` Subrata Modak
2009-08-06 11:39 ` [LTP] [PATCH][RESEND] " Sharyathi Nagesh
2009-08-07 12:41 ` Subrata Modak
2009-09-15 10:27 ` Sharyathi Nagesh
2009-09-16 15:16 ` Subrata Modak
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-21 9:35 [LTP] " Munipradeep Beerakam
2009-07-21 11:31 ` Sharyathi Nagesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A486E66.5050102@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbeeraka@in.ibm.com \
--cc=sharyath@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox