From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sf.net>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP RT Tests (Cyclic, rt-migrate, etc)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:52:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6484B0.3050009@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907201039140.3858@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3454 bytes --]
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
>> Subrata Modak wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 22:00 +0530, Sripathi Kodi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 08 July 2009 23:43:53 Subrata Modak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Darren/Sri/Gowri,
>>>>>
>>>>> Where do you want me to put this exactly inside the RT tree ?
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Subrata,
>>>>
>>>> Going by how the tests are organized currently, I think this should go
>>>> into it's own directory under testcases/realtime/func. We will need to
>>>> add a makefile to it. Are you looking at us to help you with this?
>>>>
>>> Correct. Please send me a patch which integrates it into RT tests build,
>>> install & run.
>>>
>> Just got back from a week vacation and am burning through mail as fast as I
>> can :-) Haven't had a look yet, but does this test use librttest.h? I suspect
>> not. We'll need to adapt it to run within the existing ltp real-time testing
>> framework, which includes things like buffered output as well as mlocking
>> support.
>>
>> Lastly, I'm not sure this test does anything effectively different than
>> prio-wake, already in the tree.
Just to add to Steven's comments below: At the time that rt-migrate was
written, LTP and others lacked sufficient resolution in their testing to
reliably find the type of problem that rt-migratate can pinpoint
quickly. IIRC, "football" was potentially capable of finding these
types of scheduler bugs, but it often failed to find it at all, or it
took 24h+ of runtime to find it. Steven's test could find it in under a
second or two. And, as Steven mentions below, rt-migrate is
additionally designed to look at the top N prio tasks (where N = cpu-count)
That said, I am not familiar with "prio-wake" so I am not sure if its
new or if it has direct overlap with Steven's test or not.
>> My other concerns with the test are its
>> explicit 1ms preemption criteria (as Steven described it anyway). We are
>> trying to move away from criteria being inherent in measurement tests, and 1
>> ms seems like an awfully long priority inversion to be an acceptable criteria
>> to many users.
>>
>> Steven, am I missing something conceptually here?
>>
>
> Hmm, I missed this email, sorry for the late reply.
>
> What does prio-wake do?
>
> This test is what I used to develop the rt scheduler in mainline (as well
> as in -rt). It wakes up N+1 tasks with lowering real time priorities.
> Where N is the number of CPUs in the system. Then it makes sure that the
> these tasks spread out across the CPUs. Most tests just test the highest
> priority task in the system. But those tests usually miss the second
> highest prio task in the system. If you have a second highest prio task in
> the system and a CPU is available to run, then it should run on that CPU.
> But what happens is that it can wait to be migrated and can take millisecs
> to wake up.
>
> This test makes sure that all the high prio tasks that are in the running
> state are actually running on a CPU if it can.
>
> Make sense?
>
> (BTW, current -rt and mainline now fail this test :-? )
>
> -- Steve
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 267 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-20 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1224509719.5152.116.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1224840077.5270.69.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0810240749470.25677@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[not found] ` <1229093480.5171.60.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812121533350.29763@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[not found] ` <1229347938.5353.8.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812150851290.18692@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[not found] ` <1245768486.4860.53.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907061024200.8813@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
2009-07-06 14:31 ` [LTP] LTP RT Tests (Cyclic, rt-migrate, etc) Subrata Modak
2009-07-08 18:13 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-10 16:30 ` Sripathi Kodi
2009-07-10 16:47 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-10 18:28 ` Darren Hart
2009-07-20 14:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-20 14:52 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2009-07-20 17:03 ` Darren Hart
2009-07-30 18:28 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-30 18:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-30 19:49 ` Darren Hart
2009-07-30 20:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-30 20:10 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A6484B0.3050009@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sf.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox