From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.122] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by 235xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MYFoW-0006zw-FW for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:56:08 +0000 Received: from mail-yw0-f185.google.com ([209.85.211.185]) by 72vjzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1MYFoV-0003a5-Kc for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:56:08 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so4799454ywh.10 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A77F5D9.8030101@petalogix.com> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:48:25 +0200 From: Michal Simek MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [LTP] Extended return flag Reply-To: michal.simek@petalogix.com List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: LTP , "subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , Jiri Palecek Hi All, I am thinking that will be good to extend return flag for function not implemented (errno 38) because some of tests return it when you don't have enable that option is kernel config. What do you think? Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list