[LTP] utimes01

public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [LTP] utimes01
@ 2009-08-06  9:26 Michal Simek
  2009-08-07  0:56 ` Henry Yei
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2009-08-06  9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LTP

Hi All,

Can you please run utimes01 test? I see there on x86 and Microblaze this
fault.
There is different errno value.

Thanks,
Michal

EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=13 (Permission denied)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=1 (Operation not permitted)

[root@monstr utimes]# ./utimes01
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) START
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:0,1000 <=> R:0,1000
EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) START
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:1000,0 <=> R:1000,0
EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=13 (Permission denied)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=1 (Operation not permitted)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) END => NG
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) END => OK
utimes01    1  TFAIL  :  utimes01 failed - errno = 0 : Success
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  NG

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] utimes01
  2009-08-06  9:26 [LTP] utimes01 Michal Simek
@ 2009-08-07  0:56 ` Henry Yei
  2009-08-07  6:53   ` Michal Simek
                     ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Henry Yei @ 2009-08-07  0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: michal.simek, LTP

Michal, 

This is a known issue. If you look at the manpages it states the following under the BUGS section:

Linux is not careful to distinguish between the EACCES and EPERM
    error returns.  On the other hand,  POSIX.1-2001 is buggy in its
    error description for utimes().

utimes01 passes on 2.6.28-13 kernel (Ubuntu 9.04) as well as the 2.6.18 kernel in CentOS 4.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michal Simek [mailto:michal.simek@petalogix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:26 AM
To: LTP
Subject: [LTP] utimes01

Hi All,

Can you please run utimes01 test? I see there on x86 and Microblaze this fault.
There is different errno value.

Thanks,
Michal

EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=13 (Permission denied)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=1 (Operation not permitted)

[root@monstr utimes]# ./utimes01
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) START
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:0,1000 <=> R:0,1000
EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) START
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:1000,0 <=> R:1000,0
EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=13 (Permission denied)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=1 (Operation not permitted)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) END => NG
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) END => OK
utimes01    1  TFAIL  :  utimes01 failed - errno = 0 : Success
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  NG

--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] utimes01
  2009-08-07  0:56 ` Henry Yei
@ 2009-08-07  6:53   ` Michal Simek
  2009-08-07 12:42   ` Subrata Modak
  2009-08-13  7:21   ` Mike Frysinger
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2009-08-07  6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henry Yei; +Cc: LTP

Hi Henry,
> Michal, 
>
> This is a known issue. If you look at the manpages it states the following under the BUGS section:
>
> Linux is not careful to distinguish between the EACCES and EPERM
>     error returns.  On the other hand,  POSIX.1-2001 is buggy in its
>     error description for utimes().
>
> utimes01 passes on 2.6.28-13 kernel (Ubuntu 9.04) as well as the 2.6.18 kernel in CentOS 4.
>   
I found that in source code is that second return value too. But anyway
thanks for explanation.

Michal

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michal Simek [mailto:michal.simek@petalogix.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:26 AM
> To: LTP
> Subject: [LTP] utimes01
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can you please run utimes01 test? I see there on x86 and Microblaze this fault.
> There is different errno value.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=13 (Permission denied)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=1 (Operation not permitted)
>
> [root@monstr utimes]# ./utimes01
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) START
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:0,1000 <=> R:0,1000
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) END => OK
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) START
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:1000,0 <=> R:1000,0
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) END => OK
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) START
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=13 (Permission denied)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=1 (Operation not permitted)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) END => NG
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) START
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) END => OK
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) START
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) END => OK
> utimes01    1  TFAIL  :  utimes01 failed - errno = 0 : Success
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  NG
>
> --
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
> PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
> w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>   


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] utimes01
  2009-08-07  0:56 ` Henry Yei
  2009-08-07  6:53   ` Michal Simek
@ 2009-08-07 12:42   ` Subrata Modak
  2009-08-13  7:21   ` Mike Frysinger
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Subrata Modak @ 2009-08-07 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henry Yei, michal.simek; +Cc: LTP

Michal,

My x86_32 behaves fine with this Syscall test, may be because it is
2.6.18 kernel as henry said.

$ uname -a
Linux 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:12 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux

$ ./testcases/bin/utimes01 
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) START
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:0,1000 <=> R:0,1000
EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) START
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:1000,0 <=> R:1000,0
EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) START
seteuid failed.
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) END => OK
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) START
EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) END => OK
utimes01    1  TPASS  :  utimes call succeeded 
[ltp-full-20090731]$ echo $?
0

However,

On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:56 -0700, Henry Yei wrote: 
> Michal, 
> 
> This is a known issue. If you look at the manpages it states the following under the BUGS section:
> 
> Linux is not careful to distinguish between the EACCES and EPERM
>     error returns.  On the other hand,  POSIX.1-2001 is buggy in its
>     error description for utimes().
> 
> utimes01 passes on 2.6.28-13 kernel (Ubuntu 9.04) as well as the 2.6.18 kernel in CentOS 4.

Can you send across a patch to update include the above information in
the test case itself ?

Regards--
Subrata

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michal Simek [mailto:michal.simek@petalogix.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:26 AM
> To: LTP
> Subject: [LTP] utimes01
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Can you please run utimes01 test? I see there on x86 and Microblaze this fault.
> There is different errno value.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=13 (Permission denied)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=1 (Operation not permitted)
> 
> [root@monstr utimes]# ./utimes01
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) START
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:0,1000 <=> R:0,1000
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) END => OK
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) START
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  E:1000,0 <=> R:1000,0
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=       0 errno=0 (Success)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case01) END => OK
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) START
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=13 (Permission denied)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=1 (Operation not permitted)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case02) END => NG
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) START
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=2 (No such file or directory)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case03) END => OK
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) START
> EXPECT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
> RESULT: return value(ret)=-1 errno=14 (Bad address)
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  (case04) END => OK
> utimes01    1  TFAIL  :  utimes01 failed - errno = 0 : Success
> utimes01    0  TINFO  :  NG
> 
> --
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
> PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
> w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] utimes01
  2009-08-07  0:56 ` Henry Yei
  2009-08-07  6:53   ` Michal Simek
  2009-08-07 12:42   ` Subrata Modak
@ 2009-08-13  7:21   ` Mike Frysinger
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-08-13  7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp-list


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 519 bytes --]

On Thursday 06 August 2009 20:56:58 Henry Yei wrote:
> Michal,

please do not top post

> This is a known issue. If you look at the manpages it states the following
> under the BUGS section:
>
> Linux is not careful to distinguish between the EACCES and EPERM
>     error returns.  On the other hand,  POSIX.1-2001 is buggy in its
>     error description for utimes().
>
> utimes01 passes on 2.6.28-13 kernel (Ubuntu 9.04) as well as the 2.6.18
> kernel in CentOS 4.

if POSIX allows for both, then so should LTP
-mike

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 355 bytes --]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-13  7:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-06  9:26 [LTP] utimes01 Michal Simek
2009-08-07  0:56 ` Henry Yei
2009-08-07  6:53   ` Michal Simek
2009-08-07 12:42   ` Subrata Modak
2009-08-13  7:21   ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox