Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Add new testcases for ext4 new features - V3

[Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>]

Hi,Subrata

Sorry for the late reply.

I have no time to do the following job recently.
But don't worry. I will do it before the next release.

>>> On 2009-10-26, at 07:26, Subrata Modak wrote:
>>>> We had recently added EXT4 testcases to LTP. As the author of these
>>>> tests mentioned, we saw 2 such failures in subdirectory limit test:
>>>>
>>>> Ext4 subdir limit test
>>>> ext4-subdir-limit    0  TINFO  :  Num of dirs to create: 65537, Dir  
>>>> name
>>>> len: short name                        Parent dir: mnt_point, Block
>>>> size: 1024
>>>> mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
>>>> tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
>>>> Setting test filesystem flag
>>>> /dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4: The test_fs flag is set (and ext4 is  
>>>> available).
>>>> CLEARED.
>>> You don't need to set the test_fs flag for modern ext4.
>> Miao,
>>
>> Can we change this ?

Ok, no problem.

>>>> ext4-subdir-limit    0  TINFO  :  Num of dirs to create: 65537, Dir  
>>>> name
>>>> len: long name                         Parent dir: mnt_point, Block
>>>> size: 1024
>>>> mkdir: No space left on device
>>>> ext4-subdir-limit    2  TFAIL  :  failed to create directories - 19524
...
>>>> ext4-subdir-limit    0  TINFO  :  Num of dirs to create: 65537, Dir  
>>>> name
>>>> len: long name                         Parent dir: mnt_point/sub,  
>>>> Block
>>>> size: 1024
>>>> mkdir: No space left on device
>>>> ext4-subdir-limit    4  TFAIL  :  failed to create directories - 19483
...
>>>> Is this a known issue for EXT4 ?
>>> Creating many long filenames (255 bytes) in a 1kB block filesystem is a
>>> known issue that is not expected to be fixed (at least I'm not aware of
>>> any work being done in this area).  A vast majority of filesystems
>>> today are formatted with 4kB blocks (due to disk size) and the  
>>> overhead of
>>> managing 1kB block filesystems makes these only marginally used, and it
>>> is also very rare to have applications with such large filenames.
>> Ok.

I will remove these testcases.

>> However, it is also accompanied by the following failures in the online-defrag part:
>> ========================================================================================
>> ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 1, defrag obj: 3, block size: 1024
>> 71301958656 bytes (71 GB) copied, 2694.12 s, 26.5 MB/s
>> ext4-online-defrag    3  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
...
>> ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 2, defrag obj: 3, block size: 1024
>> 71301958656 bytes (71 GB) copied, 2623.31 s, 27.2 MB/s
>> ext4-online-defrag    6  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
>> ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 1, block size: 1024
>> ext4-online-defrag    7  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
>> ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 2, block size: 1024
>> 41943040 bytes (42 MB) copied, 0.737014 s, 56.9 MB/s
>> ext4-online-defrag    8  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
>> ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 3, block size: 1024
>> 71301958656 bytes (71 GB) copied, 2544.39 s, 28.0 MB/s
>> ext4-online-defrag    9  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
>> ...
>> ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 2, block size: 4096
>> 41943040 bytes (42 MB) copied, 0.306366 s, 137 MB/s
>> ext4-online-defrag   17  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
>> ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 3, block size: 4096
>> 71241666560 bytes (71 GB) copied, 1019.79 s, 69.9 MB/s
>> ext4-online-defrag   18  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
>> incrementing stop
>> ========================================================================================
>> Did you see these failure on your machine ?

I didn't find these failure on my box.
I need more information to analyse. so I'll make a patch to get
more information later.

>> Some more points are:
>>
>>      1. Can you please run these tests against the backdrop of the
>>         Makefile changes in LTP to see all the build/install/run are
>>         executing fine,
> 
> Could you please verify this before this release. Let me know a patch if
> you find any discrepancy :-)

Sorry for that I couldn't do it before the release.
I'll do it before the next release.

> 
>> 2. Can you also please put all the utilities version info at the
>>         beginning of the test rather than printing them again and
>>         again(like mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009),tune2fs 1.41.9
>>         (22-Aug-2009),dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009),dumpe2fs 1.41.9
>>         (22-Aug-2009))
> 
> This can go in the next month release as well, if you do not have time
> to fix now. Else, i have a bug mouth to eat this as well ;-)

I'll do it before the next release.

Regards.
Miao

> 
> Regards--
> Subrata
> 
>> Regards--
>> Subrata
>>
>>>> Following the various system information on which we ran the test:
>>>> 1) uname -a
>>>> Linux 2.6.31 #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 22:57:16 IST 2009 i686 i686 i386
>>>> GNU/Linux
>>>>
>>>> 2) grep -i ext4 .config
>>>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m
>>>> CONFIG_EXT4DEV_COMPAT=y
>>>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_XATTR=y
>>>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>>>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y
>>>>
>>>> 3) mkfs.ext4 -V
>>>> mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
>>>>        Using EXT2FS Library version 1.41.9
>>>> e2fsprogs-1.41.9
>>>> e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9
>>>>
>>>> 4) LTP used:
>>>> Unreleased CVS repository. See the URL below to download:
>>>> http://ltp.sourceforge.net/documentation/how-to/ltp.php#_3.1,
>>>>
>>>> You can also also directly review the attached patch(which added this
>>>> test cases):
>>>> 26_10_2009-(Miao-Xie<miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>)- 
>>>> Add_new_testcases_for_ext4_new_features_V3.patch.regenerated,
>>>>
>>>> 5) I used a single 680GB LVM partition to test this.
>>>>
>>>> Kindly let us know your thoughts on this failures.
>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>> --
>>> Andreas Dilger
>>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
>>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
>> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
>> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
>> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
>> _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> 
> 
> 
> 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list