From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.122] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by h25xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N7j6Q-0002IZ-Hd for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:17:14 +0000 Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]) by 72vjzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1N7j6J-0007qq-Bk for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:17:14 +0000 Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAA5GqYn020127 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:46:52 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nAA5Gpdd2088960 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:46:51 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nAA5GolI014338 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:46:51 +0530 Message-ID: <4AF8F73E.10506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:46:46 +0530 From: Rishikesh MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4948C6E4.8080801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <49491512.9000905@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1229578051.5149.11.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <20090214203139.GA10969@us.ibm.com> <1234762145.7791.13.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1245768501.4860.56.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1245768501.4860.56.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] testcase pidns20, pidns21 on pid namespace List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: ltp-list , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Nadia Derbey , Gowrishankar , gowrishankar.muthukrishna@gmail.com Subrata Modak wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 10:59 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > >> Thanks Suka, >> >> On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:31 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: >> >>> Subrata Modak [subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote: >>> | >>> | > > pidns21: >>> | > > The pidns21.c testcase verifies that container-init is terminated >>> | > > by SIGUSR1 when: >>> | > > - a handler is specified for SIGUSR1, >>> | > > - container-init blocks SIGUSR1, >>> | > > - parent queues SIGUSR1 and >>> | > > - handler for SIGUSR1 is set to system default before SIGUSR1 is >>> | > > unblocked. >>> >>> I know I had acked this test before, but back then the actual implementation >>> of the signal semantics in the kernel were not complete. >>> >>> To simplify the implementation of the semantics, it was decided that >>> SIGKILL/SIGSTOP would be the only reliable signals from a parent >>> container. IOW, container-init would ignore SIGUSR1 or SIGINT, SIGQUIT >>> etc even if sent from a parent container. >>> >>> See patchset/discussion: >>> >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/17/131 >>> >>> (which is not yet merged, but appears to be close to consensus) >>> >>> The rationale for this simplification is that any serious >>> 'container-init' would explicitly SIG_IGN all signals that it is >>> not interested in. So the only signals that would be in SIG_DFL >>> state would be SIGKILL/SIGSTOP. >>> >>> Effectively, testcase pidns21 will fail if/when the above patchset >>> (specifically, patch 5/6) is merged. >>> >> Gowri, >> >> Kindly update this test when the patch makes into next stable kernel >> release. >> > > Suka/Gowri, > > Are we still looking into these tests ? > Anyone still looking into it ? Still i am getting failure for pidns21 with latest ltp release. -Rishi > Regards-- > Subrata > > >> Regards-- >> Subrata >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA >> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise >> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation >> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >> _______________________________________________ >> Ltp-list mailing list >> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! > Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. > Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list