public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: liubo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls: fix some failure on arch X86_64
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:38:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF93496.3030408@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)

1) rt_sigaction
    "sigaction" has the structure:
 
 struct sigaction {
         __sighandler_t sa_handler;
         unsigned long sa_flags;
  #ifdef SA_RESTORER
          __sigrestore_t sa_restorer;
  #endif
          sigset_t sa_mask;               /* mask last for extensibility */
 };

    However, on arch x86_64, if we directly get to call rt_sigaction,
the argument "sa_restorer" will not be fulfilled, and this will lead
 to segment fault.
    on arch x86_64, if sa_restorer is not set, kernel will lead to segment fault. 
In other arch, if sa_restorer is not set, kernel can do the correct work.
    To avoid this segment fault, we use glibc function
"int sigaction(...);" instead, which can fulfill the argument "sa_restorer".

2) rt_sigprocmask
    This failure contains two aspects,
the first is the segment fault as described in 1),
the second is that testcase uses a unknown signal 33 for test,
and this will lead sigaction cannot bind signal 33 to the action.

    So, we attempt to use a known signal instead, such as 34.

This patch fixed these failures.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>

---
 .../kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c  |    4 ++++
 .../syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c     |   12 ++++++++----
 .../syscalls/rt_sigsuspend/rt_sigsuspend01.c       |    4 ++++
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c
index 27af970..1522ac4 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c
@@ -154,7 +154,11 @@ set_handler(int sig, int sig_to_mask, int mask_flags)
                 sa.sa_flags = mask_flags;
                 sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
                 sigaddset(&sa.sa_mask, sig_to_mask);
+		#ifndef __x86_64__
                 TEST(syscall(__NR_rt_sigaction,sig, &sa, &oldaction,SIGSETSIZE));
+		#else
+		TEST(sigaction(sig, &sa, &oldaction));
+		#endif
         if (TEST_RETURN == 0) {
                 return 0;
         } else {
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c
index 6398a28..31258e9 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) {
                         	cleanup();
 				tst_exit();
 			}
-			TEST(sigaddset(&set, 33));
+			TEST(sigaddset(&set, 34));
 			if(TEST_RETURN == -1){
 				tst_resm(TFAIL,"Call to sigaddset() Failed, errno=%d : %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
                         	cleanup();
@@ -163,7 +163,11 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) {
 			
 			/* call rt_sigaction() */
 			act.sa_handler = sig_handler;
-                        TEST(syscall(__NR_rt_sigaction, 33, &act, &oact, 8));
+			#ifndef __x86_64__
+                        TEST(syscall(__NR_rt_sigaction, 34, &act, &oact, 8));
+			#else
+			TEST(sigaction(34, &act, &oact));
+			#endif
 			if(TEST_RETURN != 0){
 				tst_resm(TFAIL,"Call to rt_sigaction() Failed, errno=%d : %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
                         	cleanup();
@@ -178,7 +182,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) {
 			}
 			
 			else {
-				TEST(kill(getpid(), 33));
+				TEST(kill(getpid(), 34));
 				if(TEST_RETURN != 0){
 					tst_resm(TFAIL,"Call to kill() Failed, errno=%d : %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
                         		cleanup();
@@ -198,7 +202,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) {
                         			cleanup();
 						tst_exit();
 					}
-					TEST(sigismember(&oset, 33));
+					TEST(sigismember(&oset, 34));
 					if(TEST_RETURN == 0 ){
 						tst_resm(TFAIL,"call sigismember() Failed, errno=%d : %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
                         			cleanup();
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigsuspend/rt_sigsuspend01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigsuspend/rt_sigsuspend01.c
index 416a7c9..6132622 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigsuspend/rt_sigsuspend01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigsuspend/rt_sigsuspend01.c
@@ -142,7 +142,11 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) {
 			struct sigaction act, oact;
 		        act.sa_handler = sig_handler;
 			
+			#ifndef __x86_64__
 			TEST(syscall(__NR_rt_sigaction, SIGALRM, &act, &oact, 8));
+			#else
+			TEST(sigaction(SIGALRM, &act, &oact));
+			#endif
 			if(TEST_RETURN == -1){
 		        	tst_resm(TFAIL,"rt_sigaction() Failed, errno=%d : %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
 				cleanup();
-- 
1.6.2.2

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

             reply	other threads:[~2009-11-10  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-10  9:38 liubo [this message]
2009-11-11  1:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls: fix some failure on arch X86_64 liubo
2009-11-11  4:14   ` Garrett Cooper
2009-11-11  4:30     ` Wei Yongjun
2009-11-11  5:22     ` liubo
2009-11-11  4:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-11-11  5:03   ` Wei Yongjun
2009-11-16  8:13     ` Subrata Modak
2009-11-16  8:53       ` liubo
2009-11-26 11:11         ` Garrett Cooper
2009-11-27  5:33           ` liubo
2009-11-27  6:49             ` Garrett Cooper
2009-11-27  8:50               ` Garrett Cooper
2009-11-27 10:07                 ` liubo
2009-11-27 22:18                   ` Garrett Cooper
2009-11-29  1:22                     ` Wei Yongjun
2009-12-01  0:00                       ` Garrett Cooper
2009-12-09  7:29                         ` liubo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-09  7:34 liubo
2009-12-09 12:14 ` Subrata Modak
2009-12-18 16:03 ` Subrata Modak
2009-12-22  2:51   ` Garrett Cooper
2009-12-22 13:12     ` liubo
2010-02-22  5:21 liubo
2010-02-22  7:56 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-02-22  9:08   ` liubo
2010-02-22 18:05     ` Garrett Cooper
2010-02-23  0:59       ` liubo
2010-02-25  7:26         ` liubo
2010-02-25 10:00           ` Garrett Cooper
2010-02-26  0:35             ` liubo
2010-02-27  4:12               ` Garrett Cooper
2010-02-22  9:20 liubo
2010-02-22 14:45 ` Rishikesh K Rajak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF93496.3030408@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox