From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-4.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.124] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLdSD-0005Ap-Re for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:05:13 +0000 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by sfi-mx-4.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1NLdS3-0006Xp-EV for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:05:13 +0000 Message-ID: <4B2B7704.8000003@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:35:16 +0800 From: liubo MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1187453091.565781261137697221.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1187453091.565781261137697221.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] ade: fix the bug of ar01 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8859943494303139585==" Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Caspar Zhang Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============8859943494303139585== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010505000004050907050602" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010505000004050907050602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/18/2009 08:01 PM, Caspar Zhang wrote: > ----- "Caspar Zhang" wrote: > > >> ----- "liubo" wrote: >> >> >>> Yes, this problem does occur because of the version... >>> In binutils-2.19.51.0.2, the strange dot appears. >>> In binutils-2.17.50.0.18, the strange dot does not appear. >>> And these cause the dismatch. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Liu Bo >>> >>> >> My Fedora12 has binutils-2.19.51.0.14-34, I can't see this dot >> either. >> >> > Tested in binutils-2.19.51.0.2-17.fc11, don't see this dot either > :-( > > -Caspar > > > Are you using a 32bit box or not? I tested on a few 32bit boxes(Ubuntu Fedora), and I think it is the point. Thanks. Liu Bo --------------010505000004050907050602 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/18/2009 08:01 PM, Caspar Zhang wrote:

----- "Caspar Zhang" <czhang@redhat.com> wrote:

----- "liubo" <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> wr=
ote:=20

Yes, this problem does occur because of the version.=
..=20
In binutils-2.19.51.0.2, the strange dot appears.=20
In binutils-2.17.50.0.18, the strange dot does not appear.=20
And these cause the dismatch.=20

Thanks,=20
Liu Bo=20

My Fedora12 has binutils-2.19.51.0.14-34, I can't see =
this dot
either.

Tested in binutils-2.19.51.0.2-17.fc11, don't see=
 this dot either=20
:-(

-Caspar

=C2=A0 Are you using a 32bit box or not?
=C2=A0 I tested on a few 32bit boxes(Ubuntu Fedora), and I think it is th= e point.

=C2=A0 Thanks.
=C2=A0 Liu Bo

--------------010505000004050907050602-- --===============8859943494303139585== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev --===============8859943494303139585== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list --===============8859943494303139585==--