Re: [LTP] clone tests fails

[Michal Simek <michal.simek@petalogix.com>]

Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michal Simek (michal.simek@petalogix.com):
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I have one question about one your big patch
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/galak/ltp.git;a=commitdiff;h=391dc18fe3271fbf2ca1864a5299f091c31e0018
>>
>> My question is why you add -1 in lib/cloner.c:65
>>
>> +       ret = clone(fn, (stack ? stack + stack_size - 1 : NULL),
>> +                       clone_flags, arg);
>>
>> In previous code in clone testcases was nothing like this.
>> What reason have you had to add it?
> 
> Because the same thing was done in lots of places all over the
> testsuite (and done wrong).  This consolidates them all.


I don't have anything against consolidation. I just want to know why 
there is that -1 which weren't in any clone testcases. Nothing more 
nothing less.

Michal

> 
>> Of course the reason is that on Microblaze some tests failed.
> 
> How do they fail?  Does clone on Microblaze take the top of
> stack?
> 
> -serge


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list