From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.122] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZhoy-0005lS-Dx for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:34:52 +0000 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1NZhow-0000kY-LP for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:34:52 +0000 Message-ID: <4B5EB72B.7010909@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:34:35 +0800 From: Shi Weihua MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B5E8192.80909@cn.fujitsu.com> <364299f41001252354m16d21845h6c1bd0b53cd5c98@mail.gmail.com> <364299f41001260025v527adde4u44ff82c647d18b4e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <364299f41001260025v527adde4u44ff82c647d18b4e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Garrett Cooper Cc: ltp-list at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua wrote: >>> Hi, Cooper >>> >>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined >>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. >>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 >>> >>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. >>> ------------ >>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction). >>> ------------ >>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. >>> >>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this: >>> ------------ >>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ >>> >>> #ifdef __i386__ >>> (sa_sigaction defined here) <-- >>> #else /* __i386__ */ >>> (no sa_sigaction defined) <-- >>> #endif /* !__i386__ */ >>> >>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >>> ------------ >>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in >>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. >> >> Shi, >> I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and >> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state >> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken). > > Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick. Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ? Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-) > Thanks, > -Garrett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list