From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.121] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NjTfD-0006iE-0k for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:29:11 +0000 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1NjTfA-0004EE-Fv for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:29:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4B824029.7070609@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:28:25 +0800 From: Shi Weihua MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B7BA433.3030206@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <364299f41002170908p302cc665g874c89a109ddfd1f@mail.gmail.com> <20100218035756.GA13013@rishikesh.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20100218035756.GA13013@rishikesh.in.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] mail_tests.sh: fix a version problem of Heirloom Mail List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Rishikesh K Rajak Cc: LTP at 2010-2-18 11:57, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 09:08:39AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Rishikesh wrote: >>> Hi Shi, >>> >>> Thanks for your patch . It will be merged in feb 2010 release. >>> >>> Acked-By: Rishikesh K Rajak >>> >>> http://marc.info/?l=ltp-list&m=126440546415559&w=2 >> >> There's a lot of noise in the patch because of if-else behavior in >> trying to determine the mail app. That's why I didn't commit this (it >> requires verification of previous mail applications as well). > > Thanks Garret, Still i have not committed this to CVS repo. > > Shi, can you please verify if this patch does not break with any other > mail application. In fact, i don't know any other mail application. When i tested RHEL's alpha version, this ltp bug catched. so tried to fix it. Maybe, you should knock FOSS community(?). > > Thanks for your support. > -Rishi >> >> The mail test should be resistant to changes like these as a lot of >> developers in the FOSS community have different opinions on how to do >> things and don't follow any particular standard. This `heirloom mailx' >> support is just one said example that needs to be fixed. >> >> Thanks, >> -Garrett > > -- Shi Weihua ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list