From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.121] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmqNl-0004ll-Dq for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:21:05 +0000 Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.142]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1NmqNi-0003jN-T7 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:21:05 +0000 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.246]) by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o23FKtxH027318 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 02:20:55 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o23FFLYO1024110 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 02:15:21 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o23FKtjM011940 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 02:20:55 +1100 Received: from sachinp.in.ibm.com ([9.77.214.27]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o23FKrZh011931 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 02:20:54 +1100 Message-ID: <4B8E7E53.3010907@in.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:50:51 +0530 From: Sachin Sant MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B8E3C08.2080901@in.ibm.com> <20100303105028.GC23601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20100303105028.GC23601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > >> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball >> from Feb. >> > > Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file > once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog. > > Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from : > LTP-20100228 . > > Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But > it will be always available with master branch. > Ah thanks for the explanation. I took a fresh copy of Feb LTP and the version did show 20100228. Thanks -Sachin > Thanks > Rishi > >> The Version file still contains 20100131. >> >> :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131 >> :/home/sachin/work # >> >> Should this be 20100228 ? >> >> -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list