* [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC
@ 2010-06-17 21:12 Lucio Correia
2010-06-18 2:49 ` Akira Fujita
2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lucio Correia @ 2010-06-17 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akira Fujita; +Cc: Linux Test Project
Hi Akira,
I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6.
Have you seen that before?
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
0,
Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
write: No space left on device
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
1,
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
100,
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
1,
write: Success
write: Success
write: No space left on device
ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
100,
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
0,
Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
write: No space left on device
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
1,
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
100,
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
1,
write: Success
write: Success
write: No space left on device
ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
100,
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
Regards,
Lucio Correia
--------------
Software Engineer
IBM LTC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC
2010-06-17 21:12 [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC Lucio Correia
@ 2010-06-18 2:49 ` Akira Fujita
2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Akira Fujita @ 2010-06-18 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ljhc; +Cc: Linux Test Project
Hi Lucio,
Unfortunately, no I haven't.
I have run the ltp ext4-newfeat on FC13/REHL6 beta x86_64,
and it worked fine.
> write: No space left on device
I assume error messages you got are not related to
distro and arch but just a disk space shortage.
According to ffsb-config in ext4-newfeat,
we need 400MB (4KB * 100000 files) disk space at least.
And when I ran ext4-newfet, my ext4 size was 10GB.
Maybe you should check your disk space.
Regards,
Akira Fujita
(2010/06/18 6:12), Lucio Correia wrote:
> Hi Akira,
>
> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6.
> Have you seen that before?
>
>
>
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 0,
> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 1,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 1,
> write: Success
> write: Success
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 0,
> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 1,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 1,
> write: Success
> write: Success
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Lucio Correia
> --------------
> Software Engineer
> IBM LTC
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC
2010-06-17 21:12 [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC Lucio Correia
2010-06-18 2:49 ` Akira Fujita
@ 2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-18 17:30 ` Subrata Modak
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-18 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ljhc; +Cc: Linux Test Project, Akira Fujita
Hi Lucio,
Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2:
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
I will continue to run the tests and update you again.
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote:
> Hi Akira,
>
> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6.
> Have you seen that before?
>
>
>
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 0,
> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 1,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 1,
> write: Success
> write: Success
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 0,
> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 1,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 1,
> write: Success
> write: Success
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>
> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Lucio Correia
> --------------
> Software Engineer
> IBM LTC
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC
2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak
@ 2010-06-18 17:30 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-21 8:25 ` Akira Fujita
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-18 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ljhc; +Cc: Linux Test Project, Akira Fujita
Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY
characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures:
ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit
interval: 1,
ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit
interval: 1,
ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass
ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit
interval: 100,
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
write: No space left on device
\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘
�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�\x11]}���������\x11]~\x11]\x7fP��\x10�����0\x01\x01�ﾏ��p\x02A��,�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f���O\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]}\x10\x16\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�
Akira,
Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross
the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not
sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests:
commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448
Author: Subrata Modak <subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530
Regards--
Subrata
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi Lucio,
>
> Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2:
>
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>
> I will continue to run the tests and update you again.
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote:
> > Hi Akira,
> >
> > I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6.
> > Have you seen that before?
> >
> >
> >
> > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> > 0,
> > Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> > 1,
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> > 100,
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> > 1,
> > write: Success
> > write: Success
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> > 100,
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
> > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> > 0,
> > Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> > 1,
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> > 100,
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> > 1,
> > write: Success
> > write: Success
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> > 100,
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >
> > and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Lucio Correia
> > --------------
> > Software Engineer
> > IBM LTC
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ltp-list mailing list
> > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC
2010-06-18 17:30 ` Subrata Modak
@ 2010-06-21 8:25 ` Akira Fujita
2010-06-21 17:19 ` Subrata Modak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Akira Fujita @ 2010-06-21 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: subrata; +Cc: Linux Test Project
Hi Subrata,
> Akira,
>
> Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross
> the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not
> sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests:
>
> commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448
> Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530
Yes, we should check ext4 partition size and configure fssb write size
before testing.
AFAIK, ext4-subdir-limit test does not depend on partition size,
and over 32000 directory feature is not supported in case
1KB block size and long directory name.
So I think my fix (just skip invalid test case) is okay.
Reference: linux/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt
* lift 32000 subdirectory limit imposed by i_links_count[1]
[1] Filesystems with a block size of 1k may see a limit imposed by the
directory hash tree having a maximum depth of two.
Regards,
Akira Fujita
(2010/06/19 2:30), Subrata Modak wrote:
> Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY
> characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures:
>
> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit
> interval: 1,
> ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit
> interval: 1,
> ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass
> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit
> interval: 100,
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> write: No space left on device
> \x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘
> �p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�\x11]}���������\x11]~\x11]\x7fP��\x10�����0\x01\x01�ﾏ��p\x02A��,�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f���O\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]}\x10\x16\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�
>
> Akira,
>
> Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross
> the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not
> sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests:
>
> commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448
> Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
>> Hi Lucio,
>>
>> Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2:
>>
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
>> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
>> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
>> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
>> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>> 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>
>> I will continue to run the tests and update you again.
>>
>> Regards--
>> Subrata
>>
>> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote:
>>> Hi Akira,
>>>
>>> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6.
>>> Have you seen that before?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>> 0,
>>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>> 1,
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>> 100,
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>> 1,
>>> write: Success
>>> write: Success
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>> 100,
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>> 0,
>>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>> 1,
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>> 100,
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>> 1,
>>> write: Success
>>> write: Success
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>> 100,
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>
>>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lucio Correia
>>> --------------
>>> Software Engineer
>>> IBM LTC
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ltp-list mailing list
>>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ltp-list mailing list
>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>
>
--
Akira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com>
The First Fundamental Software Development Group,
Software Development Division,
NEC Software Tohoku, Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC
2010-06-21 8:25 ` Akira Fujita
@ 2010-06-21 17:19 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-22 8:22 ` Akira Fujita
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-21 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akira Fujita; +Cc: Linux Test Project
Is there any patch you would like to Propose ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:25 +0900, Akira Fujita wrote:
> Hi Subrata,
>
> > Akira,
> >
> > Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross
> > the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not
> > sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests:
> >
> > commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448
> > Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
> > Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530
>
> Yes, we should check ext4 partition size and configure fssb write size
> before testing.
>
> AFAIK, ext4-subdir-limit test does not depend on partition size,
> and over 32000 directory feature is not supported in case
> 1KB block size and long directory name.
> So I think my fix (just skip invalid test case) is okay.
>
> Reference: linux/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt
>
> * lift 32000 subdirectory limit imposed by i_links_count[1]
> [1] Filesystems with a block size of 1k may see a limit imposed by the
> directory hash tree having a maximum depth of two.
>
> Regards,
> Akira Fujita
>
> (2010/06/19 2:30), Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY
> > characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures:
> >
> > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit
> > interval: 1,
> > ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit
> > interval: 1,
> > ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass
> > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit
> > interval: 100,
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > write: No space left on device
> > \x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘
> > �p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�\x11]}���������\x11]~\x11]\x7fP��\x10�����0\x01\x01�ﾏ��p\x02A��,�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f���O\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]}\x10\x16\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�
> >
> > Akira,
> >
> > Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross
> > the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not
> > sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests:
> >
> > commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448
> > Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
> > Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530
> >
> > Regards--
> > Subrata
> >
> > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >> Hi Lucio,
> >>
> >> Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2:
> >>
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> >> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> >> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
> >> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
> >> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> >> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> >> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
> >> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
> >> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> >> 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> >>
> >> I will continue to run the tests and update you again.
> >>
> >> Regards--
> >> Subrata
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote:
> >>> Hi Akira,
> >>>
> >>> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6.
> >>> Have you seen that before?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> >>> 0,
> >>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> >>> 1,
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> >>> 100,
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> >>> 1,
> >>> write: Success
> >>> write: Success
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> >>> 100,
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
> >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
> >>> 0,
> >>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> >>> 1,
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> >>> 100,
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> >>> 1,
> >>> write: Success
> >>> write: Success
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
> >>> 100,
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> write: No space left on device
> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
> >>>
> >>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Lucio Correia
> >>> --------------
> >>> Software Engineer
> >>> IBM LTC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> >>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> >>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Ltp-list mailing list
> >>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> >> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> >> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ltp-list mailing list
> >> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC
2010-06-21 17:19 ` Subrata Modak
@ 2010-06-22 8:22 ` Akira Fujita
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Akira Fujita @ 2010-06-22 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: subrata; +Cc: Linux Test Project
> Is there any patch you would like to Propose ?
I don't have a patch for this.
I am glad if someone takes care of this, though.
Regards,
Akira Fujita
(2010/06/22 2:19), Subrata Modak wrote:
> Is there any patch you would like to Propose ?
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:25 +0900, Akira Fujita wrote:
>> Hi Subrata,
>>
>>> Akira,
>>>
>>> Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross
>>> the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not
>>> sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests:
>>>
>>> commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448
>>> Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
>>> Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530
>>
>> Yes, we should check ext4 partition size and configure fssb write size
>> before testing.
>>
>> AFAIK, ext4-subdir-limit test does not depend on partition size,
>> and over 32000 directory feature is not supported in case
>> 1KB block size and long directory name.
>> So I think my fix (just skip invalid test case) is okay.
>>
>> Reference: linux/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt
>>
>> * lift 32000 subdirectory limit imposed by i_links_count[1]
>> [1] Filesystems with a block size of 1k may see a limit imposed by the
>> directory hash tree having a maximum depth of two.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Akira Fujita
>>
>> (2010/06/19 2:30), Subrata Modak wrote:
>>> Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY
>>> characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures:
>>>
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit
>>> interval: 1,
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit
>>> interval: 1,
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass
>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit
>>> interval: 100,
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> write: No space left on device
>>> \x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘
>>> �p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�\x11]}���������\x11]~\x11]\x7fP��\x10�����0\x01\x01�ﾏ��p\x02A��,�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f���O\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]}\x10\x16\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�
>>>
>>> Akira,
>>>
>>> Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross
>>> the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not
>>> sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests:
>>>
>>> commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448
>>> Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
>>> Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530
>>>
>>> Regards--
>>> Subrata
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
>>>> Hi Lucio,
>>>>
>>>> Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2:
>>>>
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>>> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>>> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
>>>> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
>>>> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>>> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>>> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
>>>> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc,
>>>> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass
>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>>> 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>>>
>>>> I will continue to run the tests and update you again.
>>>>
>>>> Regards--
>>>> Subrata
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote:
>>>>> Hi Akira,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6.
>>>>> Have you seen that before?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>>>> 0,
>>>>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>>>> 1,
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>>>> 100,
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>>>> 1,
>>>>> write: Success
>>>>> write: Success
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>>>> 100,
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
>>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO:
>>>>> 0,
>>>>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>>>> 1,
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>>>> 100,
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>>>> 1,
>>>>> write: Success
>>>>> write: Success
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval:
>>>>> 100,
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> write: No space left on device
>>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure
>>>>>
>>>>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lucio Correia
>>>>> --------------
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> IBM LTC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>>>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>>>>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ltp-list mailing list
>>>>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>>>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ltp-list mailing list
>>>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-22 8:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-17 21:12 [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC Lucio Correia
2010-06-18 2:49 ` Akira Fujita
2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-18 17:30 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-21 8:25 ` Akira Fujita
2010-06-21 17:19 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-22 8:22 ` Akira Fujita
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox