* [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC @ 2010-06-17 21:12 Lucio Correia 2010-06-18 2:49 ` Akira Fujita 2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Lucio Correia @ 2010-06-17 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Akira Fujita; +Cc: Linux Test Project Hi Akira, I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6. Have you seen that before? ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 write: No space left on device ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 1, write: No space left on device write: No space left on device write: No space left on device write: No space left on device ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 100, write: No space left on device write: No space left on device write: No space left on device ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 1, write: Success write: Success write: No space left on device ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 100, write: No space left on device write: No space left on device ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 write: No space left on device ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 1, write: No space left on device write: No space left on device write: No space left on device write: No space left on device ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 100, write: No space left on device write: No space left on device write: No space left on device ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 1, write: Success write: Success write: No space left on device ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 100, write: No space left on device write: No space left on device ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. Regards, Lucio Correia -------------- Software Engineer IBM LTC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC 2010-06-17 21:12 [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC Lucio Correia @ 2010-06-18 2:49 ` Akira Fujita 2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Akira Fujita @ 2010-06-18 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ljhc; +Cc: Linux Test Project Hi Lucio, Unfortunately, no I haven't. I have run the ltp ext4-newfeat on FC13/REHL6 beta x86_64, and it worked fine. > write: No space left on device I assume error messages you got are not related to distro and arch but just a disk space shortage. According to ffsb-config in ext4-newfeat, we need 400MB (4KB * 100000 files) disk space at least. And when I ran ext4-newfet, my ext4 size was 10GB. Maybe you should check your disk space. Regards, Akira Fujita (2010/06/18 6:12), Lucio Correia wrote: > Hi Akira, > > I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6. > Have you seen that before? > > > > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 0, > Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > write: No space left on device > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 1, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 1, > write: Success > write: Success > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 0, > Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > write: No space left on device > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 1, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 1, > write: Success > write: Success > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. > > > Regards, > > > > Lucio Correia > -------------- > Software Engineer > IBM LTC > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC 2010-06-17 21:12 [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC Lucio Correia 2010-06-18 2:49 ` Akira Fujita @ 2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak 2010-06-18 17:30 ` Subrata Modak 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-18 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ljhc; +Cc: Linux Test Project, Akira Fujita Hi Lucio, Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2: ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 I will continue to run the tests and update you again. Regards-- Subrata On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote: > Hi Akira, > > I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6. > Have you seen that before? > > > > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 0, > Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > write: No space left on device > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 1, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 1, > write: Success > write: Success > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 0, > Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > write: No space left on device > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 1, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 1, > write: Success > write: Success > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. > > > Regards, > > > > Lucio Correia > -------------- > Software Engineer > IBM LTC > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC 2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-18 17:30 ` Subrata Modak 2010-06-21 8:25 ` Akira Fujita 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-18 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ljhc; +Cc: Linux Test Project, Akira Fujita Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures: ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit interval: 1, ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit interval: 1, ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: 100, write: No space left on device write: No space left on device write: No space left on device \x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘 �p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�\x11]}���������\x11]~\x11]\x7fP��\x10�����0\x01\x01�ﾏ��p\x02A��,�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f���O\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]}\x10\x16\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w� Akira, Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 Author: Subrata Modak <subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 Regards-- Subrata On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > Hi Lucio, > > Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2: > > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, > isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, > isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, > isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, > isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > > I will continue to run the tests and update you again. > > Regards-- > Subrata > > On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote: > > Hi Akira, > > > > I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6. > > Have you seen that before? > > > > > > > > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > > 0, > > Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > > 1, > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > > 100, > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > > 1, > > write: Success > > write: Success > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > > 100, > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. > > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > > 0, > > Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > > 1, > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > > 100, > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > > 1, > > write: Success > > write: Success > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > > 100, > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > > > and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Lucio Correia > > -------------- > > Software Engineer > > IBM LTC > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > > _______________________________________________ > > Ltp-list mailing list > > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC 2010-06-18 17:30 ` Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-21 8:25 ` Akira Fujita 2010-06-21 17:19 ` Subrata Modak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Akira Fujita @ 2010-06-21 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: subrata; +Cc: Linux Test Project Hi Subrata, > Akira, > > Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross > the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not > sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: > > commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 > Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> > Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 Yes, we should check ext4 partition size and configure fssb write size before testing. AFAIK, ext4-subdir-limit test does not depend on partition size, and over 32000 directory feature is not supported in case 1KB block size and long directory name. So I think my fix (just skip invalid test case) is okay. Reference: linux/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt * lift 32000 subdirectory limit imposed by i_links_count[1] [1] Filesystems with a block size of 1k may see a limit imposed by the directory hash tree having a maximum depth of two. Regards, Akira Fujita (2010/06/19 2:30), Subrata Modak wrote: > Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY > characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures: > > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit > interval: 1, > ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit > interval: 1, > ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit > interval: 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > \x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘 > �p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�\x11]}���������\x11]~\x11]\x7fP��\x10�����0\x01\x01�ﾏ��p\x02A��,�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f���O\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]}\x10\x16\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w� > > Akira, > > Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross > the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not > sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: > > commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 > Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> > Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 > > Regards-- > Subrata > > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: >> Hi Lucio, >> >> Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2: >> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> >> I will continue to run the tests and update you again. >> >> Regards-- >> Subrata >> >> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote: >>> Hi Akira, >>> >>> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6. >>> Have you seen that before? >>> >>> >>> >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>> 0, >>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 1, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 1, >>> write: Success >>> write: Success >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>> 0, >>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 1, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 1, >>> write: Success >>> write: Success >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Lucio Correia >>> -------------- >>> Software Engineer >>> IBM LTC >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate >>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the >>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ltp-list mailing list >>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate >> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the >> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo >> _______________________________________________ >> Ltp-list mailing list >> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > > -- Akira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com> The First Fundamental Software Development Group, Software Development Division, NEC Software Tohoku, Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC 2010-06-21 8:25 ` Akira Fujita @ 2010-06-21 17:19 ` Subrata Modak 2010-06-22 8:22 ` Akira Fujita 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-21 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Akira Fujita; +Cc: Linux Test Project Is there any patch you would like to Propose ? Regards-- Subrata On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:25 +0900, Akira Fujita wrote: > Hi Subrata, > > > Akira, > > > > Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross > > the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not > > sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: > > > > commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 > > Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> > > Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 > > Yes, we should check ext4 partition size and configure fssb write size > before testing. > > AFAIK, ext4-subdir-limit test does not depend on partition size, > and over 32000 directory feature is not supported in case > 1KB block size and long directory name. > So I think my fix (just skip invalid test case) is okay. > > Reference: linux/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt > > * lift 32000 subdirectory limit imposed by i_links_count[1] > [1] Filesystems with a block size of 1k may see a limit imposed by the > directory hash tree having a maximum depth of two. > > Regards, > Akira Fujita > > (2010/06/19 2:30), Subrata Modak wrote: > > Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY > > characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures: > > > > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit > > interval: 1, > > ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit > > interval: 1, > > ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass > > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit > > interval: 100, > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > write: No space left on device > > \x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘 > > �p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�\x11]}���������\x11]~\x11]\x7fP��\x10�����0\x01\x01�ﾏ��p\x02A��,�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f���O\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]}\x10\x16\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w� > > > > Akira, > > > > Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross > > the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not > > sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: > > > > commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 > > Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> > > Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 > > > > Regards-- > > Subrata > > > > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > >> Hi Lucio, > >> > >> Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2: > >> > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > >> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > >> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, > >> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, > >> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > >> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > >> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, > >> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, > >> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass > >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > >> 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > >> > >> I will continue to run the tests and update you again. > >> > >> Regards-- > >> Subrata > >> > >> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote: > >>> Hi Akira, > >>> > >>> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6. > >>> Have you seen that before? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > >>> 0, > >>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > >>> 1, > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > >>> 100, > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > >>> 1, > >>> write: Success > >>> write: Success > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > >>> 100, > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. > >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: > >>> 0, > >>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > >>> 1, > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > >>> 100, > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > >>> 1, > >>> write: Success > >>> write: Success > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: > >>> 100, > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> write: No space left on device > >>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > >>> > >>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Lucio Correia > >>> -------------- > >>> Software Engineer > >>> IBM LTC > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > >>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > >>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Ltp-list mailing list > >>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > >> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > >> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Ltp-list mailing list > >> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC 2010-06-21 17:19 ` Subrata Modak @ 2010-06-22 8:22 ` Akira Fujita 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Akira Fujita @ 2010-06-22 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: subrata; +Cc: Linux Test Project > Is there any patch you would like to Propose ? I don't have a patch for this. I am glad if someone takes care of this, though. Regards, Akira Fujita (2010/06/22 2:19), Subrata Modak wrote: > Is there any patch you would like to Propose ? > > Regards-- > Subrata > > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:25 +0900, Akira Fujita wrote: >> Hi Subrata, >> >>> Akira, >>> >>> Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross >>> the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not >>> sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: >>> >>> commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 >>> Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> >>> Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 >> >> Yes, we should check ext4 partition size and configure fssb write size >> before testing. >> >> AFAIK, ext4-subdir-limit test does not depend on partition size, >> and over 32000 directory feature is not supported in case >> 1KB block size and long directory name. >> So I think my fix (just skip invalid test case) is okay. >> >> Reference: linux/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt >> >> * lift 32000 subdirectory limit imposed by i_links_count[1] >> [1] Filesystems with a block size of 1k may see a limit imposed by the >> directory hash tree having a maximum depth of two. >> >> Regards, >> Akira Fujita >> >> (2010/06/19 2:30), Subrata Modak wrote: >>> Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY >>> characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures: >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit >>> interval: 1, >>> ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit >>> interval: 1, >>> ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit >>> interval: 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> \x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘 >>> �p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w�\x11]}���������\x11]~\x11]\x7fP��\x10�����0\x01\x01�ﾏ��p\x02A��,�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f���O\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]\x7f�\x11]}\x10\x16\x11]�0��������\x11]�@\x11]����O\x10�����0\x01\x01�碘�p\x02A��,�\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x13\x11]�\x14\x11]\x7fP\x17\x11]�p��������\x11]����N\x10�����0\x01\x01�����p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x11\x11]����������\x11]�������0�p\x02A��$�\x11]��\x12\x11]����������\x11]������0�p\x01w� >>> >>> Akira, >>> >>> Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross >>> the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not >>> sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: >>> >>> commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 >>> Author: Subrata Modak<subratamodak@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> >>> Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 >>> >>> Regards-- >>> Subrata >>> >>> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: >>>> Hi Lucio, >>>> >>>> Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2: >>>> >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>>> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>>> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >>>> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >>>> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>>> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>>> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >>>> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >>>> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>>> 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>>> >>>> I will continue to run the tests and update you again. >>>> >>>> Regards-- >>>> Subrata >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote: >>>>> Hi Akira, >>>>> >>>>> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6. >>>>> Have you seen that before? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>>>> 0, >>>>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>>>> 1, >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>>>> 100, >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>>>> 1, >>>>> write: Success >>>>> write: Success >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>>>> 100, >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. >>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>>>> 0, >>>>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>>>> 1, >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>>>> 100, >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>>>> 1, >>>>> write: Success >>>>> write: Success >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>>>> 100, >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> write: No space left on device >>>>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>>>> >>>>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lucio Correia >>>>> -------------- >>>>> Software Engineer >>>>> IBM LTC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate >>>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the >>>>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Ltp-list mailing list >>>>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate >>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the >>>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ltp-list mailing list >>>> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list >>> >>> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-22 8:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-06-17 21:12 [LTP] ffsb failures running ltp-ext4 new features test on SLES11sp1 PPC Lucio Correia 2010-06-18 2:49 ` Akira Fujita 2010-06-18 6:09 ` Subrata Modak 2010-06-18 17:30 ` Subrata Modak 2010-06-21 8:25 ` Akira Fujita 2010-06-21 17:19 ` Subrata Modak 2010-06-22 8:22 ` Akira Fujita
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox