Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Probe an bigger linear available address to attachment.

[yangzi <wei.yang@windriver.com>]

Hi
It failed on the first sub-testcase and on the mips architecture.
Thanks
wei.yang

Garrett Cooper wrote:
> 2010/8/31 Yang, Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>:
>> Hi
>>
>> When running shmat01 on some platforms, it fails on
>> "addr = shmat(*(tc.shmid), base_addr + tc.offset,tc.flags);"
>> with a INVAL error. Look at codes in "setup()", it probes
>> an available address and align the address to SHMLBA. After
>> alignment, the new address is no guarantee to be available
>> any more. Here a bigger size is used to probe so that it's
>> still valid address after alignment.Pertaining to the function
>> setup_tc(lc, &tc) ,when it outside of "for (i = 0; i < TST_TOTAL;
>> i++)",and printf the tc.offset value is always 0,add correct a mistake
>> of original codes to move "setup_tc()" to right place.
> 
> Which of the sub-testcases fail and on which architecture(s)?
> Thanks,
> -Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list