From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwUPe-0001dw-Dx for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:27:10 +0000 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1OwUPc-00041y-OK for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:27:10 +0000 Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.75]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o8H6R100004727 for (envelope-from eramoto.masaya@jp.fujitsu.com); Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:27:01 +0900 Received: from smail (m5 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076D145DE4F for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:27:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.95]) by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C5345DE51 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:27:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AD2E18003 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:27:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.103]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75006E38001 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:27:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml13.css.fujitsu.com (ml13 [127.0.0.1]) by ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D85FFD0002 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:27:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [10.124.101.175]) by ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC904FD0001 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:26:59 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4C930A2F.1000007@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:26:55 +0900 From: ERAMOTO Masaya MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C92EBBE.8090108@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LTP] Fix warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: ltp-list Hi Garrett, > 1. Negative return values from main are bad. > 2. 0 would be better, otherwise it's going to cause more churn on the > list because people without the support are going to start asking the > question: "why is this testcase failing"? > > I'll implement return 0 instead. I ACK it. Thanks you for your explanation, ERAMOTO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list