* [LTP] Fix warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c
@ 2010-09-17 4:17 ERAMOTO Masaya
2010-09-17 4:47 ` Garrett Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: ERAMOTO Masaya @ 2010-09-17 4:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1611 bytes --]
Hi,
I found the following warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c.
===============
make[5]: Entering directory `/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test'
gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -I/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/include -I../../../../../include -I../../../../../include
-L/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/../cpuset_lib
-L/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/../../libcontrollers -L../../../../../lib cpuset_syscall_test.c -lltp -lcpu_set
-lcontrollers -lltp -o cpuset_syscall_test
cpuset_syscall_test.c: In function 'main':
cpuset_syscall_test.c:254: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
make[5]: Leaving directory `/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test'
===============
This warning appears because it doesn't have "return <num>" in main().
The attached patch will fix it.
Signed-off-by: ERAMOTO Masaya <eramoto.masaya@jp.fujitsu.com>
===============
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
index 961d0f9..0d4fe87 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
@@ -251,5 +251,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
#else
int main (void) {
printf("System doesn't have required mempolicy support\n");
+ return -1;
}
#endif
===============
Thanks,
ERAMOTO
[-- Attachment #2: fix_warning_at_cpuset_syscall_test.c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 534 bytes --]
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
index 961d0f9..0d4fe87 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
@@ -251,5 +251,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
#else
int main (void) {
printf("System doesn't have required mempolicy support\n");
+ return -1;
}
#endif
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 276 bytes --]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [LTP] Fix warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c
2010-09-17 4:17 [LTP] Fix warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c ERAMOTO Masaya
@ 2010-09-17 4:47 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-09-17 6:26 ` ERAMOTO Masaya
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-09-17 4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ERAMOTO Masaya; +Cc: ltp-list
2010/9/16 ERAMOTO Masaya <eramoto.masaya@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I found the following warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c.
>
> ===============
> make[5]: Entering directory `/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test'
> gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -I/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/include -I../../../../../include -I../../../../../include
> -L/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/../cpuset_lib
> -L/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/../../libcontrollers -L../../../../../lib cpuset_syscall_test.c -lltp -lcpu_set
> -lcontrollers -lltp -o cpuset_syscall_test
> cpuset_syscall_test.c: In function 'main':
> cpuset_syscall_test.c:254: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
> make[5]: Leaving directory `/root/ltp/ltp-old/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test'
> ===============
>
> This warning appears because it doesn't have "return <num>" in main().
> The attached patch will fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: ERAMOTO Masaya <eramoto.masaya@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ===============
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
> b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
> index 961d0f9..0d4fe87 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_syscall_test/cpuset_syscall_test.c
> @@ -251,5 +251,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> #else
> int main (void) {
> printf("System doesn't have required mempolicy support\n");
> + return -1;
> }
> #endif
1. Negative return values from main are bad.
2. 0 would be better, otherwise it's going to cause more churn on the
list because people without the support are going to start asking the
question: "why is this testcase failing"?
I'll implement return 0 instead.
Thanks for the heads up!
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [LTP] Fix warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c
2010-09-17 4:47 ` Garrett Cooper
@ 2010-09-17 6:26 ` ERAMOTO Masaya
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ERAMOTO Masaya @ 2010-09-17 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
Hi Garrett,
> 1. Negative return values from main are bad.
> 2. 0 would be better, otherwise it's going to cause more churn on the
> list because people without the support are going to start asking the
> question: "why is this testcase failing"?
>
> I'll implement return 0 instead.
I ACK it.
Thanks you for your explanation,
ERAMOTO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-17 6:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-17 4:17 [LTP] Fix warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c ERAMOTO Masaya
2010-09-17 4:47 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-09-17 6:26 ` ERAMOTO Masaya
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox