Re: [LTP] ltp_clone alignment issues.

[Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amoroso@st.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/27/2010 3:34 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Folks,
> I want to reopen an old discussion on ltp_clone and stack alignment
> issue (see
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=4B421480.1040400%40petalogix.com).
> Indeed recently a commit has partially fixed a problem on ARM
> (0056e395170eb8fc3ffbb22d7bd364fe47c2013e), but I think this should be
> extended to all archs that have stack that grows downwards.
> 
> Indeed, as Jiri replied in that old thread, the value passed to clone as
> child stack should be never accessed, because it is the topmost address
> of the memory allocated for the child process (it's the previous stack
> pointer).
> 
> So, in archs that do not like unaligned stack, using (stack - size - 1 )
> will cause the process to be killed by a SIGBUS, on other archs, we are
> just wasting one byte of the malloc-ed stack.
> 
> On my SH4 arch, the stack must be 4byte aligned (as in ARM).
> 
> Please, find attached a patch against master branch
> 
> Best regards,
> Carmelo

Hi,
any feedback on this ?

Cheers,
Carmelo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyjQHAACgkQoRq/3BrK1s9mRQCfYVc9ePJRwf5hd6NRvjtjHsLO
sxYAoMj83bu0I4cvU+iEUpH4iXGuBJTD
=s2GZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list