From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: Don't use clock_settime() to reset a CPU-time Clock
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:20:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD796BD.6050303@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikkEAuO5jPXExneKC7OHbOViTErs_Fu_XasYma4@mail.gmail.com>
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Gui Jianfeng wrote:
>>> This case is trying to set CPU-time clock(ID is returned by clock_getcpuclockid()) of
>>> a specific process by calling clock_settime(). But Linux kernel doesn't allow to reset
>>> a CPU-time clock of a specific process. Kernel returns -EPERM. So test fails.
>>>
>>> In "IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition", It's said as following:
>>> If _POSIX_CPUTIME is defined, implementations shall support clock ID values obtained by
>>> invoking clock_getcpuclockid(), which represent the CPU-time clock of a given process.
>>> Implementations shall also support the special clockid_t value CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID,
>>> which represents the CPU-time clock of the calling process when invoking one of the
>>> clock_*() or timer_*() functions. For these clock IDs, the values returned by
>>> clock_gettime() and specified by clock_settime() represent the amount of execution time
>>> of the process associated with the clock. Changing the value of a CPU-time clock via
>>> clock_settime() shall have no effect on the behavior of the sporadic server scheduling
>>> policy.
>>>
>>> So the behaviour when changing the value of a CPU-time clock via clock_settime() is
>>> operating system specific.
>>>
>>> We may change the test progress to stop using clock_settime(). Now, We just make use
>>> of clock_gettime() instead to achieve the same test purpose.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Hi Garrett,
>>
>> How do you think this fix?
>
> The tort is the same in POSIX 2008.1. Taking out the chaff...
>
> a. If _POSIX_CPUTIME is defined, implementations shall support clock
> ID values obtained by invoking clock_getcpuclockid(), which represent
> the CPU-time clock of a given process.
> b. Implementations shall also support the special clockid_t value
> CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, which represents the CPU-time clock of the
> calling process when invoking one of the clock_*() or timer_*()
> functions.
> c. For these clock IDs, the values returned by clock_gettime() and
> specified by clock_settime() represent the amount of execution time of
> the process associated with the clock.
>
> Nowhere does it say that you can't set that clock. Try running the
> test as root to see what you can do... if the test fails (even as
> root), then Linux needs to be fixed to conform to POSIX.
POSIX also says that:
Changing the value of a CPU-time clock via clock_settime() shall have no effect
on the behavior of the sporadic server scheduling policy.
IMHO, this means clock_settime() implementation is OS specific, is it?
So, even if Linux fails to set this clock, it's just fine. Am i missing something?
Gui
>
> Also, try running the other tests I just added to see whether or not
> the function call fails per POSIX's requirements.
>
> Thanks!
> -Garrett
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a
Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your
business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-29 2:39 [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: Don't use clock_settime() to reset a CPU-time Clock Gui Jianfeng
2010-11-08 4:09 ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-11-08 6:02 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-11-08 6:20 ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2010-11-15 3:20 ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-11-18 20:29 ` Cyril Hrubis
[not found] ` <AANLkTimz2WBPfwCBHajqzA7Uk_72MZeTJdWB0Zbkch8B@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=YvMBmUQLSmtq8aM0+s2-X3BmRM13fSUa6a1-1@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4CF4CCD7.3060009@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-12-02 12:13 ` Cyril Hrubis
2010-12-30 16:50 ` Cyril Hrubis
2011-02-24 6:21 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-25 14:50 ` Cyril Hrubis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-02 0:29 [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: Don\'t " Mitani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD796BD.6050303@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=yanegomi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox