From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1Psfz3-0007Vf-K5 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:32:13 +0000 Received: from e28smtp03.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.3]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.74) id 1Psfz2-0003Jk-7K for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:32:13 +0000 Received: from d28relay01.in.ibm.com (d28relay01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.58]) by e28smtp03.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p1OIW4io018638 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:02:04 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay01.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p1OIW4XJ4354054 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:02:04 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p1PAVrgs018095 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:01:53 +0530 Message-ID: <4D66A410.8020500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:01:44 +0530 From: Shubham Goyal MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D42FFBE.3080105@redhat.com> <4D58DD0A.2050403@redhat.com> <4D640B55.1050300@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LTP] Review Required: [Re: [PATCH] fix mail02, 03 fail due to different sender names] List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Garrett Cooper Cc: LTP list Alright Garrett..., so how should we take the patches in userland arena in future (including this one from Caspar)? I mean should they be reviewed and merged upstream? Do LSB currently involved in maintaining them? Thanks, Shubham On Wednesday 23 February 2011 02:38 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Shubham Goyal > wrote: >> Hi Caspar, >> >> I reviewed/verified your patch and it seems to be working fine. I verified >> it on RHEL6 and both mail02 and mail03 tests are passing now. I believe it >> can be merged upstream. >> Garrett, Any comments? > I guess... there's no apparent rhyme nor reason to GNU/Linux > userland software development, so I'm not going to fight these issues > anymore. > The LSB should maintain these tests and standardize things if > anyone really cares like the opengroup folks do for all of Unix. > Thanks, > -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list