[LTP] hugeshmdt01: -I5 or -i5?

[LTP] hugeshmdt01: -I5 or -i5?

[Caspar Zhang]

The hugeshm* tests in runtest/hugetlb are:

hugeshmat01 hugeshmat01 -i 5
hugeshmat02 hugeshmat02 -i 5
hugeshmat03 hugeshmat03 -i 5

hugeshmctl01 hugeshmctl01 -i 5
hugeshmctl02 hugeshmctl02 -i 5
hugeshmctl03 hugeshmctl03 -i 5

hugeshmdt01 hugeshmdt01 -I 5 <--- *-I or -i?*

hugeshmget01 hugeshmget01 -i 10
hugeshmget02 hugeshmget02 -i 10
hugeshmget03 hugeshmget03 -i 10
hugeshmget05 hugeshmget05 -i 10

I wonder whether hugeshmdt01 should be repeated for 5 times, or 5
seconds? (5 seconds is enough to execute the test for thousands times...
That will produce tens ~ hundreds MB log)

Thanks,
Caspar

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] hugeshmdt01: -I5 or -i5?

[Garrett Cooper]

2011/4/11 Caspar Zhang <czhang@redhat.com>:
> The hugeshm* tests in runtest/hugetlb are:
>
> hugeshmat01 hugeshmat01 -i 5
> hugeshmat02 hugeshmat02 -i 5
> hugeshmat03 hugeshmat03 -i 5
>
> hugeshmctl01 hugeshmctl01 -i 5
> hugeshmctl02 hugeshmctl02 -i 5
> hugeshmctl03 hugeshmctl03 -i 5
>
> hugeshmdt01 hugeshmdt01 -I 5 <--- *-I or -i?*
>
> hugeshmget01 hugeshmget01 -i 10
> hugeshmget02 hugeshmget02 -i 10
> hugeshmget03 hugeshmget03 -i 10
> hugeshmget05 hugeshmget05 -i 10
>
> I wonder whether hugeshmdt01 should be repeated for 5 times, or 5
> seconds? (5 seconds is enough to execute the test for thousands times...
> That will produce tens ~ hundreds MB log)

    Good question. "How many iterations does it take to reproduce the
problem?" is probably a good question to ask.
Cheers,
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] hugeshmdt01: -I5 or -i5?

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
>     Good question. "How many iterations does it take to reproduce the
> problem?" is probably a good question to ask.

The source doesn't say that we should run this for several seconds. And
the test seems to be testing functionality rather than regression (also
there is no clear line between these two). But still I thik it's safe to
assume that this is a typo. Anybody any objections?

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] hugeshmdt01: -I5 or -i5?

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> > The source doesn't say that we should run this for several seconds. And
> > the test seems to be testing functionality rather than regression (also
> > there is no clear line between these two). But still I thik it's safe to
> > assume that this is a typo. Anybody any objections?
> 
>     No, but I'd prefer is someone changed the 'typo', ran the test a
> few times in positive cases as opposed to blindly commit what someone
> considered a 'typo', and make the test ineffective.
>     Digging through the CVS/git commit email and/or the mail archives
> to determine what the contributor had in mind for the test would
> definitely help. The latter might be painful depending on the test
> submission though.

Okay, lets see what is in the logs.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] hugeshmdt01: -I5 or -i5?

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> >>     Good question. "How many iterations does it take to reproduce the
> >> problem?" is probably a good question to ask.
> >
> > The source doesn't say that we should run this for several seconds. And
> > the test seems to be testing functionality rather than regression (also
> > there is no clear line between these two). But still I thik it's safe to
> > assume that this is a typo. Anybody any objections?
> 
>     No, but I'd prefer is someone changed the 'typo', ran the test a
> few times in positive cases as opposed to blindly commit what someone
> considered a 'typo', and make the test ineffective.
>     Digging through the CVS/git commit email and/or the mail archives
> to determine what the contributor had in mind for the test would
> definitely help. The latter might be painful depending on the test
> submission though.

Okay git -p log says that the line was added by Subrata, CCing.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list