Re: [LTP] [PATCH] ksm: mempolicy syscalls not implemented

[Caspar Zhang <czhang@redhat.com>]

On 04/12/2011 04:13 PM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
> 
> since NUMA is only supported on a few i386 systems, mempolicy syscalls
> ([gs]et_mempolicy, mbind) may not implemented, thus, an ENOSYS errno
> should be acceptable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Caspar Zhang <czhang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/mem/ksm/ksm02.c |    9 +++++++--
>  testcases/kernel/mem/ksm/ksm04.c |    9 +++++++--
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Hi, anyone can review this patch and get it merged if suitable?

Thanks,
Caspar

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list