* [LTP] ext4-online-defrag test doesn't work due to too old e4defrag command
@ 2011-11-24 2:51 Kazuya Mio
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kazuya Mio @ 2011-11-24 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
Hi,
I tried to test ext4-online-defrag, but it didn't work well due to
the following errors:
ext4-online-defrag 0 TINFO : defrag type: 1, defrag obj: 2, block size: 1024
"/opt/ltp/testcases/bin/mnt_point/data0"
File is not regular file [ NG ]
Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
<snip>
Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
ext4-online-defrag 2 TPASS : ext4 online defrag test pass
This is because e4defrag is too old to defrag the file in the latest kernel.
I think we should use the latest e4defrag command that is contained in e2fsprogs.
Regards,
Kazuya Mio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [LTP] ext4-online-defrag test doesn't work due to too old e4defrag command
@ 2011-11-28 5:25 Kazuya Mio
2011-11-30 7:26 ` Wanlong Gao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kazuya Mio @ 2011-11-28 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
Hi,
I tried to test ext4-online-defrag, but it didn't work well due to
the following errors:
ext4-online-defrag 0 TINFO : defrag type: 1, defrag obj: 2, block size: 1024
"/opt/ltp/testcases/bin/mnt_point/data0"
File is not regular file [ NG ]
Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
<snip>
Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
ext4-online-defrag 2 TPASS : ext4 online defrag test pass
This is because e4defrag is too old to defrag the file in the latest kernel.
I think we should use the latest e4defrag command that is contained in e2fsprogs.
Regards,
Kazuya Mio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ext4-online-defrag test doesn't work due to too old e4defrag command
2011-11-28 5:25 Kazuya Mio
@ 2011-11-30 7:26 ` Wanlong Gao
2011-11-30 8:34 ` Kazuya Mio
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wanlong Gao @ 2011-11-30 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kazuya Mio; +Cc: ltp-list
Hi Kazuya:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to test ext4-online-defrag, but it didn't work well due to
> the following errors:
>
> ext4-online-defrag 0 TINFO : defrag type: 1, defrag obj: 2, block size: 1024
> "/opt/ltp/testcases/bin/mnt_point/data0"
> File is not regular file [ NG ]
> Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
> Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
> <snip>
> Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
> Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
> ext4-online-defrag 2 TPASS : ext4 online defrag test pass
>
> This is because e4defrag is too old to defrag the file in the latest kernel.
> I think we should use the latest e4defrag command that is contained in e2fsprogs.
Are you sure that the latest e4defrag can PASS? Did you test with it already?
Thanks
-Wanlong Gao
>
> Regards,
> Kazuya Mio
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] ext4-online-defrag test doesn't work due to too old e4defrag command
2011-11-30 7:26 ` Wanlong Gao
@ 2011-11-30 8:34 ` Kazuya Mio
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kazuya Mio @ 2011-11-30 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gaowanlong; +Cc: ltp-list
2011/11/30 16:26, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> Hi Kazuya:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to test ext4-online-defrag, but it didn't work well due to
>> the following errors:
>>
>> ext4-online-defrag 0 TINFO : defrag type: 1, defrag obj: 2, block size: 1024
>> "/opt/ltp/testcases/bin/mnt_point/data0"
>> File is not regular file [ NG ]
>> Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
>> Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
>> <snip>
>> Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
>> Failed to defrag:Bad file descriptor [ NG ]
>> ext4-online-defrag 2 TPASS : ext4 online defrag test pass
>>
>> This is because e4defrag is too old to defrag the file in the latest kernel.
>> I think we should use the latest e4defrag command that is contained in e2fsprogs.
>
>
> Are you sure that the latest e4defrag can PASS? Did you test with it already?
Yes. I tested the latest e2fsprogs (commit:499d5ec558). I confirmed that
e4defrag works fine.
However, ext4-online-defrag test suite detects fsck error because it deletes
lost+found directory in ext4.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-30 8:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-24 2:51 [LTP] ext4-online-defrag test doesn't work due to too old e4defrag command Kazuya Mio
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-28 5:25 Kazuya Mio
2011-11-30 7:26 ` Wanlong Gao
2011-11-30 8:34 ` Kazuya Mio
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox