* [LTP] [PATCH 1/:] For mips architecture, SHMLBA is not equal to PAGE_SIZE base_addr is not available address for process after base_addr is aligned to next SHMLBA address. so we should probe a bigger available virtual address space for ensuring that a wide range from base_addr aligned to next SHMLBA to base_addr + INT_SIZE always is available
@ 2011-12-27 6:45 Wei.Yang
2011-12-27 6:59 ` wyang1
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wei.Yang @ 2011-12-27 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list; +Cc: wei.yang
From: Wei Yang <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c
index 7c68459..344ad3f 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ void check_functionality(int);
#define CASE1 20 /* memory location. */
int shm_id_1 = -1;
+#if defined(__mips__) || defined(__mips64)
+int shm_id_2 = -1;
+#endif
void *base_addr; /* By probing this address first, we can make
* non-aligned addresses from it for different
@@ -262,14 +265,34 @@ void setup(void)
tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to create shared memory "
"resource 1 in setup()");
}
-
/* Probe an available linear address for attachment */
+#if defined(__mips__) || defined(__mips64)
+ /*
+ * For mips architecture, SHMLBA is not equal to PAGE_SIZE
+ * base_addr is not available address for process after
+ * base_addr is aligned to next SHMLBA address
+ */
+ if ((shm_id_2 = shmget(shmkey++, SHMLBA, SHM_RW | IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL)) == -1) {
+ tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to create shared memory ");
+ }
+ if ((base_addr = shmat(shm_id_2, NULL, 0)) == (void *) -1) {
+ rm_shm(shm_id_2);
+ tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Couldn't attach shared memory");
+ }
+ if (shmdt((const void *)base_addr) == -1) {
+ rm_shm(shm_id_2);
+ tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Couldn't detach shared memory");
+ }
+ rm_shm(shm_id_2);
+#else
if ((base_addr = shmat(shm_id_1, NULL, 0)) == (void *)-1) {
tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Couldn't attach shared memory");
}
if (shmdt((const void *)base_addr) == -1) {
tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Couldn't detach shared memory");
}
+#endif
+
/* some architectures (e.g. parisc) are strange, so better always align to
* next SHMLBA address. */
@@ -299,4 +322,4 @@ void cleanup(void)
*/
TEST_CLEANUP;
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
--
1.7.0.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/:] For mips architecture, SHMLBA is not equal to PAGE_SIZE base_addr is not available address for process after base_addr is aligned to next SHMLBA address. so we should probe a bigger available virtual address space for ensuring that a wide range from base_addr aligned to next SHMLBA to base_addr + INT_SIZE always is available
2011-12-27 6:45 [LTP] [PATCH 1/:] For mips architecture, SHMLBA is not equal to PAGE_SIZE base_addr is not available address for process after base_addr is aligned to next SHMLBA address. so we should probe a bigger available virtual address space for ensuring that a wide range from base_addr aligned to next SHMLBA to base_addr + INT_SIZE always is available Wei.Yang
@ 2011-12-27 6:59 ` wyang1
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: wyang1 @ 2011-12-27 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2414 bytes --]
Hi Cyril
Please ignore this patch. I am so sorry for my fault.:-[ I will resend
it.
thanks
wei
On 12/27/2011 02:45 PM, Wei.Yang@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Wei Yang<Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang<Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c
> index 7c68459..344ad3f 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmat/shmat01.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ void check_functionality(int);
> #define CASE1 20 /* memory location. */
>
> int shm_id_1 = -1;
> +#if defined(__mips__) || defined(__mips64)
> +int shm_id_2 = -1;
> +#endif
>
> void *base_addr; /* By probing this address first, we can make
> * non-aligned addresses from it for different
> @@ -262,14 +265,34 @@ void setup(void)
> tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to create shared memory "
> "resource 1 in setup()");
> }
> -
> /* Probe an available linear address for attachment */
> +#if defined(__mips__) || defined(__mips64)
> + /*
> + * For mips architecture, SHMLBA is not equal to PAGE_SIZE
> + * base_addr is not available address for process after
> + * base_addr is aligned to next SHMLBA address
> + */
> + if ((shm_id_2 = shmget(shmkey++, SHMLBA, SHM_RW | IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL)) == -1) {
> + tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to create shared memory ");
> + }
> + if ((base_addr = shmat(shm_id_2, NULL, 0)) == (void *) -1) {
> + rm_shm(shm_id_2);
> + tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Couldn't attach shared memory");
> + }
> + if (shmdt((const void *)base_addr) == -1) {
> + rm_shm(shm_id_2);
> + tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Couldn't detach shared memory");
> + }
> + rm_shm(shm_id_2);
> +#else
> if ((base_addr = shmat(shm_id_1, NULL, 0)) == (void *)-1) {
> tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Couldn't attach shared memory");
> }
> if (shmdt((const void *)base_addr) == -1) {
> tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Couldn't detach shared memory");
> }
> +#endif
> +
>
> /* some architectures (e.g. parisc) are strange, so better always align to
> * next SHMLBA address. */
> @@ -299,4 +322,4 @@ void cleanup(void)
> */
> TEST_CLEANUP;
>
> -}
> \ No newline at end of file
> +}
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3481 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 355 bytes --]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-27 6:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-27 6:45 [LTP] [PATCH 1/:] For mips architecture, SHMLBA is not equal to PAGE_SIZE base_addr is not available address for process after base_addr is aligned to next SHMLBA address. so we should probe a bigger available virtual address space for ensuring that a wide range from base_addr aligned to next SHMLBA to base_addr + INT_SIZE always is available Wei.Yang
2011-12-27 6:59 ` wyang1
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox